2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eusipco.2015.7362370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient cooperative localization algorithm in LOS/NLOS environments

Abstract: The well-known cooperative localization algorithm, 'sumproduct algorithm over a wireless network' (SPAWN) has two major shortcomings, a relatively high computational complexity and a large communication load. Using the Gaussian mixture model with a model selection criterion and the sigma-point (SP) methods, we propose the SPAWN-SP to overcome these problems. The SPAWN-SP easily accommodates different localization scenarios due to its high flexibility in message representation. Furthermore, harsh LOS/NLOS envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…space-alternating generalized expectationmaximization (SAGE) [33] and Kalman enhanced super resolution tracking (KEST) [34], iteratively estimate all MPCs for multipath mitigation. The NLOS bias effect can be mitigated by exploiting the NLOS bias distribution [30], [35], [36] or applying identify-and-discard techniques in either signal [37] or location domain [38]. Most NLOS bias mitigation techniques require a-priori information or training data and may be subject to NLOS classification failure.…”
Section: ) Multi-link Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…space-alternating generalized expectationmaximization (SAGE) [33] and Kalman enhanced super resolution tracking (KEST) [34], iteratively estimate all MPCs for multipath mitigation. The NLOS bias effect can be mitigated by exploiting the NLOS bias distribution [30], [35], [36] or applying identify-and-discard techniques in either signal [37] or location domain [38]. Most NLOS bias mitigation techniques require a-priori information or training data and may be subject to NLOS classification failure.…”
Section: ) Multi-link Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the sampling problem in Eq. (20) can be designed in a bottom-up manner, meaning that we first develop a sampling strategy and then derive the associated distribution q(x i x l ′ j , r ij ). Given r ij , x l ′ j and the measurement model in Eq.…”
Section: ) Position Variable Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initialization: Self-Localization: Every node i with |Γa(i)| ≥ 3 self-localizes by solving (26) and estimates α via (25) and p 0 via (23), thus obtaining (p (i) 0 ,α (i) ,x i ); Broadcast: Every node which self-localized broadcasts its local estimates (p (i) 0 ,α (i) ,x i ); Consensus: All the nodes agree on global values of (p 0 ,α) by averaging all the local estimates (p (i) 0 ,α (i) ); Iterative scheme: Start with n ← 1; Update position: Every node i with |Γa(i)| + |Γ as a benchmark for both RD-ML and D-ML. In the following, this algorithm will be denoted by C-MLE.…”
Section: Algorithm 2 Distributed Maximum Likelihood (D-ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectation-Maximization (EM) [21], and its variant, Expectation-Conditional Maximization (ECM) [22], the unknown positions are treated as deterministic, while in Bayesian algorithms, e.g. Nonparametric Belief Propagation (NBP) [23], Sum-Product Algorithm over Wireless Networks (SPAWN) [24,25] and its variant Sigma-Point SPAWN [26], the unknown positions are assumed to be random variables with a known prior distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%