2007
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2006.889211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Cross-Layer Error Control for Wireless Video Multicast

Abstract: In this paper we develop cross-layer schemes combining source rate selection, power management, and error control for wireless multicast of SNR scalable video. In particular, two error control schemes are analyzed and compared. The first one, type 2 hybrid ARQ/FEC, is based on incremental redundancy chosen to recover losses and provide the required level of video quality. The second one, called noncausal error control, relies on error concealment from future video data whose quality is adaptively adjusted to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it was optimized the relationship between the average PSNR and the outage probability in a video broadcast service, obtaining the maximum possible video quality. This technique was studied in several papers [17][18][19] due to the numerous possibilities of configuration and the conceptualization offered by the cross-layer architecture.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it was optimized the relationship between the average PSNR and the outage probability in a video broadcast service, obtaining the maximum possible video quality. This technique was studied in several papers [17][18][19] due to the numerous possibilities of configuration and the conceptualization offered by the cross-layer architecture.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved video quality was achieved by the proposed scheme at a limited delay. Layered video has been considered for transmission using HARQ schemes in either unicast or multicast scenarios [16]- [20]. The authors of [16] presented a theoretical analysis as well as rich experimental results for characterizing both unicast and multicast scenarios for transmission over packet-erasure channels, while the authors of [17]- [20] provided solutions for multicast systems transmitting layered video using various HARQ schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such challenges lead to packet losses which are recovered by two techniques: Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) and Forward Error Correction (FEC). ARQ recovers packets by retransmitting the lost packets during timeouts or responding to the explicit requests from the receiver whereas FEC [9], [10] acts in advance by sending redundant packets along with original packets to recover successfully at the receiver in case of packet losses. Out of the two approaches, FEC guarantees the low retransmission delay and variation in delay (also known as "jitter") and thus suitable for real-time data transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%