1991
DOI: 10.1145/99902.99905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Delaunay triangulation using rational arithmetic

Abstract: Many fundamental tests performed by geometric algorithms can be formulated in terms of finding the sign of a determinant. When these tests are implemented using fixed-precision arithmetic such es floating point, they can produce incorrect answers; when they are implemented using arbitraryprecision arithmetic, they are expensive to compute. We present adaptive-precision algorithms for finding the signs of determinant of matrices with integer and rational elements. These algorithms were developed and tested by i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, exact implementations are often far too slow, especially when we are dealing with nonlinear primitives. Karasick et al [22] noted that naive implementations can take several orders of magnitude longer than an equivalent floating-point implementation, an observation that is consis-tent with our experience. The goal has been to find techniques that reduce the performance penalty to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Unfortunately, exact implementations are often far too slow, especially when we are dealing with nonlinear primitives. Karasick et al [22] noted that naive implementations can take several orders of magnitude longer than an equivalent floating-point implementation, an observation that is consis-tent with our experience. The goal has been to find techniques that reduce the performance penalty to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This principle has been used widely in numerically robust geometric computation (Ottmann et al, 1987;Sugihara and Iri, 1989;Karasick et al, 1991;Sugihara, 1992;Schorn, 1991;Benouamer et al, 1993;Fortune and von Wyk, 1993).…”
Section: Correct Judgement In Finite Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group is the "exact-arithmetic approach", which relies on numerical computation absolutely (Sugihara and Iri, 1989;Ottmann et al, 1987;Karasick et al, 1991;Sugihara, 1992;Schorn, 1991;Benouamer et al, 1993;Fortune and von Wyk, 1993;Sugihara, 1997;Yap, 1995). The topological structure of a geometric object can be decided by the signs of the results of numerical computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karasick et al [16] report their experiences optimizing a method for determinant evaluation using rational inputs. Their approach reduces the bit complexity of the inputs by performing arithmetic on intervals (with low precision bounds) rather than exact values.…”
Section: Related Work In Robust Computational Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%