2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient diabatic quantum algorithm in number factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum annealing for the PFP is one such interesting task that was reported recently. [19][20][21][22] With the progress of PFP on quantum annealers, it is quite natural to explore the solvability of the DLP on the same computing platform. Thus, we are motivated to make an initial step towards solving the DLP using quantum annealers.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantum annealing for the PFP is one such interesting task that was reported recently. [19][20][21][22] With the progress of PFP on quantum annealers, it is quite natural to explore the solvability of the DLP on the same computing platform. Thus, we are motivated to make an initial step towards solving the DLP using quantum annealers.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the DLP and PFP have an inseparable connection. Quantum annealing for the PFP is one such interesting task that was reported recently 19‐22 . With the progress of PFP on quantum annealers, it is quite natural to explore the solvability of the DLP on the same computing platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the uncertainty surrounding adiabatic methods, in recent years there has been explored other strategies such as non-adiabatic or diabatic quantum computing [24,[37][38][39][40]. In the diabatic case, transitions between the ground and excited states are allowed in regions where the gap becomes exponentially small, therefore avoiding the time complexity carried by adiabatic evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the factorization problem that is solved once the success probability is higher or equal to 1/8 and record the evolution time 𝑇 . [35,36] Numerically, we find that the success evolution time 𝑇 falls into two categories: [36] (i) one is 𝑇 < 10 which we call the factorization problem "easy", (ii) the other is 𝑇 > 100 (calculation stops at 𝑇 > 100 due to insufficient computational power) which we call the factorization problem "hard". In fact, the success evolution time is estimated to be larger than 500 for all the hard problems we calculated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%