2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient electrochemical detection of dopamine with carbon nanocoils and copper tetra(p-methoxyphenyl)porphyrin nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electroactive surface area of different modified electrodes (bare GCE, TPP, Mn-TPP, RGO, TPP/RGO, and Mn-TPP/RGO) was determined by performing cyclic voltammetry in 0.5 mM K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] and 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (Figure S5). The effective surface area of the electrodes was calculated by using the Randles–Sevcik equation , as given below: I p = 2.69 × 10 5 × A × D 1 / 2 × υ 1 / 2 × n 3 / 2 × C 0 where I p represents the peak current in amperes; A designates the effective surface area (ESA); D is the distribution coefficient of the redox probe [Fe(CN) 6 ] −3/ –4 , i.e., 7.6 × 10 –6 cm 2 s –1 ; υ represents the scan rate in V/s; n designates the number of electrons; and C 0 refers to the concentration of [Fe(CN) 6 ] −3/ –4 in mol/L. The ESAs of bare GCE, TPP, Mn-TPP, RGO, TPP/RGO, and Mn-TPP/RGO were found to be 0.37, 0.10, 0.16, 0.15, 0.39, and 0.43 cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electroactive surface area of different modified electrodes (bare GCE, TPP, Mn-TPP, RGO, TPP/RGO, and Mn-TPP/RGO) was determined by performing cyclic voltammetry in 0.5 mM K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] and 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (Figure S5). The effective surface area of the electrodes was calculated by using the Randles–Sevcik equation , as given below: I p = 2.69 × 10 5 × A × D 1 / 2 × υ 1 / 2 × n 3 / 2 × C 0 where I p represents the peak current in amperes; A designates the effective surface area (ESA); D is the distribution coefficient of the redox probe [Fe(CN) 6 ] −3/ –4 , i.e., 7.6 × 10 –6 cm 2 s –1 ; υ represents the scan rate in V/s; n designates the number of electrons; and C 0 refers to the concentration of [Fe(CN) 6 ] −3/ –4 in mol/L. The ESAs of bare GCE, TPP, Mn-TPP, RGO, TPP/RGO, and Mn-TPP/RGO were found to be 0.37, 0.10, 0.16, 0.15, 0.39, and 0.43 cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the electrode was estimated by dividing the value of the slope (obtained from the calibration curve between peak current I pa and concentration of analyte DOX) by the electroactive surface area of the electrode. Similarly, the limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantification (LoQ) were obtained by and , respectively LoD = 3 × false( standard 0.25em deviation 0.25em of 0.25em blank false) slope 0.25em obtained 0.25em from 0.25em concentration 0.25em studies 0.25em of 0.25em analyte LoQ = 10 × false( standard 0.25em deviation 0.25em of 0.25em blank false) slope 0.25em obtained 0.25em from 0.25em concentration 0.25em studies 0.25em of 0.25em analyte …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we will discuss some of the sensors used for the detection of amino acids (L-Tryptophan, L-Tyrosine, L-Cysteine, L-Histidine), [132,133] volatile organic compounds (VOCs), [134][135][136][137][138] herbicides (dimethoate, methyl parathion, glyphosate), [139,140] relevant organic acids (nicotinic, pipecolic, uric, folic, sorbic and ascorbic acid), [141][142][143][144][145][146][147] polyphenols, [148][149][150][151] pharmaceutical compounds (sildenafil citrate, sulfadiazine, sulfamethoxazole, isoniazid, chloramphenicol, ibuprofen, trimethoprim, diclofenac, acetaminophen), [151][152][153][154] and hormones and neurotransmitters (cortisol, 17β-estradiol, levodopa, carbidopa, dopamine). [145,147,[155][156][157][158] The detection methods for amino acids and pharmaceutical compounds have been described in detail in the reviews of Cruz-Navarro et al [19] and Gonçalves et al [159] For a more detailed description of all compounds see Table S1.…”
Section: Biological Pharmaceutical and Environmental Medium-sized Int...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their unique properties, copper phthalocyanines (CuPcs) have demonstrated signi cant potential in various bio-applications. In biosensing, CuPcs are utilized for their strong a nity to speci c biomolecules, enabling highly sensitive and selective detection of DNA sequences, proteins, and neurotransmitters [11][12][13][14][15]. Their electrochemical characteristics make them ideal for developing biosensors with rapid response times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%