2005
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2005.860195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient electromagnetic near-field computation by the multilevel fast multipole method employing mixed near-field/far-field translations

Abstract: Method of moments (MoM) solutions of electromagnetic surface integral equations provide the desired amplitudes of the equivalent surface currents on the Huygens' surfaces around the involved objects, where the solution process is nowadays routinely accelerated by fast integral methods such as the multilevel fast multipole method (MLFMM). Computation of radiated or scattered electromagnetic fields produced by these currents requires integration over the Huygens' surfaces and can easily become extremely time-con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compute the electromagnetic near-and farfields from a known current distribution, the same efficient hierarchical scheme can be employed (Tzoulis and Eibert, 2005). For all lowest level MLFMM groups (smallest boxes), the computed currents are used to generate a plane wave representation of the corresponding radiated fields (Eibert, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compute the electromagnetic near-and farfields from a known current distribution, the same efficient hierarchical scheme can be employed (Tzoulis and Eibert, 2005). For all lowest level MLFMM groups (smallest boxes), the computed currents are used to generate a plane wave representation of the corresponding radiated fields (Eibert, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r M g in (12) and (13) is therefore r M g = r M − r g . If |r M g | is considerably larger than the relevant MLFMM group dimensions and the extent of the probe antenna (i.e., some FF criterion is fulfilled) [13,14], the translation operator in (11) can be replaced by…”
Section: Model and Constraint Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix entries in (12) and (13) are written with direct translations from some MLFMM group center to probe positions. However, the evaluation can also be done in a way that the translations are performed into some MLFMM group center and the wave contributions at the probe positions are then obtained by the MLFMM typical disaggregation and anterpolation procedures [7,12,13,20].…”
Section: Model and Constraint Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Far-field translations to the measurement points fulfilling the far-field criterion for the source boxes on the given level are performed first. For every measurement point the highest level for which far-field translations may be used is determined in the pre-processing step and translations are preferably carried out on the highest possible level (Tzoulis and Eibert, 2005), since the overall number of translations is smaller for a lower number of source boxes. In the next step the plane wave spectra of the boxes on the given level are interpolated to the sampling rate on the next higher level and aggregated to the centre of the parent box.…”
Section: Hybrid Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%