Electrocatalytic conversion of CO 2 to chemical fuels serves a two-fold purpose of energy storage and carbon offset. Among those, the efficiency of electrocatalytic reduction of CO 2 to one-carbon (C 1 ) products including CO [1][2][3] and formate [4][5][6] is approaching commercialization, while the transformation of CO 2 to C 2 products such as ethylene [7][8][9][10] and ethanol [11,12] is developing rapidly. In comparison, research on the conversion of CO 2 to high-energy C 3 fuels like n-propanol [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] is seriously lagging behind despite the unique merits of products, e.g., high added value and easy management.Metallic Cu is known to be the only efficient catalyst by far for the electroreduction of CO 2 to n-propanol. Since the pioneering report on electroreduction of CO 2 to n-propanol at Cu electrode in 1988, [14] several strategies of modifying copper-based catalysts, including structural reconstruction, [15] two-step activation, [16] metal ion cycling, [17] core-shell structure [18] and double sulfur vacancies, [19] have been developed, pushing the FE of n-propanol to 15.4% and the partial current density to 10.2 mA cm -2 . Nevertheless, complex design on Cu catalysts are needed, because n-propanol formation involves multiple active sites that are responsible for the reduction of CO 2 to CO intermediate and subsequent carbon-carbon coupling, respectively. Such drawback largely limits the selection of Cu-based catalysts, thus impeding commercial production of n-propanol from CO 2 electroreduction.We notice that direct electrocatalytic reduction of CO (CORR) could considerably promote n-propanol generation. [20,21] Early work on CORR obtained a FE in excess of 20% for n-propanol at gas diffusion electrode in a flow cell. [21][22][23][24] Furthermore, an Ag-Ru-Cu alloy catalyst endowed FE of 36% for propanol at the current density of 300 mA cm -2 . [23] Unfortunately, owing to the risk of high-pressure storage of CO and high equipment maintenance cost, it is not realistic to achieve either industrial or decentralized multi-carbon products using CO as a feedstock.Distinct from CO, CO 2 is a safe, cheap, and easily liquefied gas. Hence, we propose that a tandem catalytic CO 2 RR system consisting of two independent sections of CO 2 to CO and CO to n-propanol may easily solve the problem of highpressure CO storage. [25] Since the input chemicals account for the largest proportion of cost in CORR industrialization, [23] Electrocatalytic reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 RR) to high-energy-density C 3 fuels like n-propanol has been widely recognized as one of the core technologies for both renewable energy storage and carbon neutrality. Unfortunately, exceptional catalytic sites that are able to simultaneously implement efficient conversion to C 1 and C 2 products are difficult to design for single electrolyzers, leading to poor activity and selectivity toward n-propanol. Alternatively, electroreduction of CO (CORR) has shown good performance toward C 3 fuels, but the cost and safety of gas storage h...