2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient failure-recovering supervisors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition 4.2 (u − v−controllable reachability). Consider a system G in (16) with a set of secret states Q s , the (security) level sets Σ i (i ∈ [0, n − 1]) in (2), and let u ≥ 1, v ≥ 0, and Σ be a nonempty subset of Σ ≥v c in (17). We say that Q s is reachable with at least u controllable events of (security) level at least v w.r.t.…”
Section: Policy Computation For Uscpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Definition 4.2 (u − v−controllable reachability). Consider a system G in (16) with a set of secret states Q s , the (security) level sets Σ i (i ∈ [0, n − 1]) in (2), and let u ≥ 1, v ≥ 0, and Σ be a nonempty subset of Σ ≥v c in (17). We say that Q s is reachable with at least u controllable events of (security) level at least v w.r.t.…”
Section: Policy Computation For Uscpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, S u−1 for G (if they exist) as well as the minimum cost index i min . Each supervisor is computed by the UCC function (lines [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and provides a different control policy such that every string reaching secret states has at least one controllable event of (security) level at v. So in total, S 0 , . .…”
Section: Policy Computation For Uscpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation