2014
DOI: 10.3311/ppci.7405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient finite element analysis using graph-theoretical force method; rectangular plane stress and plane strain serendipity family elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different algorithms are available for optimization with various applications [26,[28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different algorithms are available for optimization with various applications [26,[28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class takes the element forces along the edges of the elements [21][22][23][24][25] and in the second class the element forces are concentrated at the mid-edge of the edges of the elements [26,27]. In this paper, an efficient method is developed for the formation of null bases for finite element models comprising of rectangular plane stress and plane strain Lagrange family elements leading to highly sparse and banded flexibility matrices, and can be used for optimal finite element analysis by the force method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were employed to divide complicated large problems into sub-systems and solve the smaller parts with less computational complexity and then combine the solutions (i.e. divide and conquer methods) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were employed to divide complicated large problems into sub-systems and solve the smaller parts with less computational complexity and then combine the solutions (i.e. divide and conquer methods) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].There are various structural/mechanical systems with geometries close to those of regular structures, but not satisfying the required mathematical conditions to be considered as regular. A model is called regular if it can be considered as the product of two or three graphs [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%