2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.talo.2023.100232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient flat membrane based liquid phase microextraction of cathinones from environmental water and biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it's worth noting that the reported studies comparing EME and SLM-LPME were conducted using aqueous solutions rather than biological samples. Compared with aqueous samples, biological sample matrices are more complex, and different matrices can affect analyte extraction [25][26][27]. For example, many analytes bind to substances present in the matrix, and the desorption constants of the analyte-matrix complexes are closely related to the kinetics of the analytes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it's worth noting that the reported studies comparing EME and SLM-LPME were conducted using aqueous solutions rather than biological samples. Compared with aqueous samples, biological sample matrices are more complex, and different matrices can affect analyte extraction [25][26][27]. For example, many analytes bind to substances present in the matrix, and the desorption constants of the analyte-matrix complexes are closely related to the kinetics of the analytes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-aromatic SLMs of complex samples are less efficient, and aromatic SLMs exhibit superior EME recoveries than non-aromatic solvents in buffer solutions [26]. In addition, SLM-LPME provided higher recoveries for buffer solution and urine in comparison to blood samples [27]. Nonetheless, a comparison of the performance of EME and SLM-LPME for different biological samples is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%