2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Gene Tree Correction Guided by Genome Evolution

Abstract: MotivationsGene trees inferred solely from multiple alignments of homologous sequences often contain weakly supported and uncertain branches. Information for their full resolution may lie in the dependency between gene families and their genomic context. Integrative methods, using species tree information in addition to sequence information, often rely on a computationally intensive tree space search which forecloses an application to large genomic databases.ResultsWe propose a new method, called ProfileNJ, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this 215 topological constraint is not verified in the original gene tree, SCORPiOs proposes a corrected, fully-resolved gene tree that is both species-tree and synteny-consistent. We explore the constrained topologies solution space using the fast distance-based approach implemented by the program ProfileNJ (Noutahi et al 2016). Briefly, ProfileNJ independently resolves each multifurcated orthogroup, so as to minimize the reconciliation cost with the species-tree.…”
Section: Gene Tree Correction and Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this 215 topological constraint is not verified in the original gene tree, SCORPiOs proposes a corrected, fully-resolved gene tree that is both species-tree and synteny-consistent. We explore the constrained topologies solution space using the fast distance-based approach implemented by the program ProfileNJ (Noutahi et al 2016). Briefly, ProfileNJ independently resolves each multifurcated orthogroup, so as to minimize the reconciliation cost with the species-tree.…”
Section: Gene Tree Correction and Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we denote gene duplication, gene loss, and horizontal gene transfer events as DTL events. (Chen et al, 2000;Noutahi et al, 2016;Scornavacca et al, 2014) consists in contracting weakly supported gene tree branches into polytomies, which are subsequently resolved using the species tree. This heuristic limits the set of gene trees explored to trees that can be obtained as combinations of alternative resolutions of the contracted branches, and in most existing implementations (Chen et al, 2000;Noutahi et al, 2016) based on parsimony requires arbitrary DTL parsimony costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Chen et al, 2000;Noutahi et al, 2016;Scornavacca et al, 2014) consists in contracting weakly supported gene tree branches into polytomies, which are subsequently resolved using the species tree. This heuristic limits the set of gene trees explored to trees that can be obtained as combinations of alternative resolutions of the contracted branches, and in most existing implementations (Chen et al, 2000;Noutahi et al, 2016) based on parsimony requires arbitrary DTL parsimony costs. This is especially problematic if the substitution model is miss-specified, or fails to adequately capture the complexity of the data (which if often the case for shorter gene alignments where parameter rich substitution models are more difficult to use).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the choice of homologs is a poorly examined aspect of modern phylogenetic analysis even though various ortholog-calling errors associated with ancient paralogy have been noted (NOUTAHI et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%