2014
DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.246173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Generation of Marker-Free Transgenic Rice Plants Using an Improved Transposon-Mediated Transgene Reintegration Strategy

Abstract: (S.Q.).Marker-free transgenic plants can be developed through transposon-mediated transgene reintegration, which allows intact transgene insertion with defined boundaries and requires only a few primary transformants. In this study, we improved the selection strategy and validated that the maize (Zea mays) Activator/Dissociation (Ds) transposable element can be routinely used to generate marker-free transgenic plants. A Ds-based gene of interest was linked to green fluorescent protein in transfer DNA (T-DNA), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a transgenic plant with independent insertions of each of these constructs, the selectable marker can be segregated genetically ( Hare and Chua, 2002 ; Puchta, 2003 ; Darbani et al., 2007 ; Ling et al., 2016 ). Alternatively, SMGs can be removed by excision via homologous recombination ( Puchta, 2000 ; Zubko et al., 2000 ), elimination by transposition ( Maeser and Kahmann, 1991 ; Gao et al., 2015 ) or, by the use of recombinases to excise unwanted DNA. Several recombination systems have been used to excise SMGs, including Cre/lox from bacteriophage P1 ( Hoess et al., 1982 ; Hoess and Abremski, 1985 ), Flp/frt from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( Cox, 1983 ; Senecoff et al., 1985 ), R/RS from Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ( Araki et al., 1985 ), and Gin / gix from bacteriophage ( Klippel et al., 1988 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a transgenic plant with independent insertions of each of these constructs, the selectable marker can be segregated genetically ( Hare and Chua, 2002 ; Puchta, 2003 ; Darbani et al., 2007 ; Ling et al., 2016 ). Alternatively, SMGs can be removed by excision via homologous recombination ( Puchta, 2000 ; Zubko et al., 2000 ), elimination by transposition ( Maeser and Kahmann, 1991 ; Gao et al., 2015 ) or, by the use of recombinases to excise unwanted DNA. Several recombination systems have been used to excise SMGs, including Cre/lox from bacteriophage P1 ( Hoess et al., 1982 ; Hoess and Abremski, 1985 ), Flp/frt from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( Cox, 1983 ; Senecoff et al., 1985 ), R/RS from Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ( Araki et al., 1985 ), and Gin / gix from bacteriophage ( Klippel et al., 1988 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzed REs resulted generally lowly transcribed. The low transcript abundance of LTR-REs in plants has often been reported [51,[53][54][55][56]. In certain species, increased expression in plants exposed to biotic or abiotic stresses was reported; however, the global level of expression remained low even during stressful treatments [57][58][59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first approach, the selectable marker genes and the gene of interest are introduced at different loci of the plant genome by co-transformation (the mechanism is shown in Figure 1(a1–a4), after which the selectable marker gene is segregated out by crossing sexually [30]. The second method entails the elimination of selectable markers by transposition [31,32]. To eliminate the selectable marker using transposon-mediated transgene reintegration is an advantageous strategy for marker gene removal (the mechanism is shown in Figure 1(b1,b2), because it allows intact transgene insertion with defined boundaries and requires only a few primary transformants [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%