1995
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0031909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Graph Rewriting and Its Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes for a simple algorithm at the expense of performance. A more performance focussed implementation might use a search plan [4,21] in which a graph morphism is built incrementally by adding both nodes and edges to an existing partial morphism, back-tracking if no suitable candidate can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This makes for a simple algorithm at the expense of performance. A more performance focussed implementation might use a search plan [4,21] in which a graph morphism is built incrementally by adding both nodes and edges to an existing partial morphism, back-tracking if no suitable candidate can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , h k m ] that match l k with respect to label matching and rootedness 4 An environment is paired with each host node. The result is a list of lists [[h 1 1 , .…”
Section: Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be useful, for example, for temporal graphs [21]; we would be interested in exploring this direction further to tackle suitable real-world applications. Another potential application area is inside graph rewriting systems [10]. Here, the pattern graphs are considered "fixed", rather than being part of the input, which has implications for the theoretical complexity of the problem.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, linear-time graph algorithms in imperative languages may be slowed down to polynomial time when they are recast as rule-based programs. To speed up matching, GP 2 supports 'rooted' graph transformation where graphs in rules and host graphs are equipped with socalled root nodes, originally developed by Dörr [41]. Roots in rules must match roots in the host graph so that matches are restricted to the neighbourhood of the host graph's roots.…”
Section: Rooted Gp 2 Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%