[1992] Proceedings. 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.1992.201595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient image understanding based on the Markov random field model and error backpropagation network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They consider an interpretation of a scene as an MRF and define the optimal matching as the MAP estimate of the MRF. Other works in MRF-based recognition can be found in (Grenander and Y. Chow 1991;Baddeley and van Lieshout 1992;Friedland and Rosenfeld 1992;Kim and Yang 1992;Cooper et al 1993). This contradicts the promises of MAP-MRF modeling.…”
Section: Work In Relational Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They consider an interpretation of a scene as an MRF and define the optimal matching as the MAP estimate of the MRF. Other works in MRF-based recognition can be found in (Grenander and Y. Chow 1991;Baddeley and van Lieshout 1992;Friedland and Rosenfeld 1992;Kim and Yang 1992;Cooper et al 1993). This contradicts the promises of MAP-MRF modeling.…”
Section: Work In Relational Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRF modeling provides one approach to optimization-based object recognition (Modestino and Zhang 1989;Cooper 1990;Baddeley and van Lieshout 1992;Kim and Yang 1992;Li 1994a). MRF modeling provides one approach to optimization-based object recognition (Modestino and Zhang 1989;Cooper 1990;Baddeley and van Lieshout 1992;Kim and Yang 1992;Li 1994a).…”
Section: Application In Mrf Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many systems which attempt to identify all of the pixels in an object require fully supervised training data that has the objects segmented or extremely obvious [29,15,9,16,31,26,2,18,32,8,11,21,10,28]. Training data that contains pixel level segmentations is extremely tedious to obtain, however, so such systems are not able to scale to large datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%