2006
DOI: 10.1155/asp/2006/58564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Implementation of Complex Modulated Filter Banks Using Cosine and Sine Modulated Filter Banks

Abstract: The recently introduced exponentially modulated filter bank (EMFB) is a 2M-channel uniform, orthogonal, critically sampled, and frequency-selective complex modulated filter bank that satisfies the perfect reconstruction (PR) property if the prototype filter of an M-channel PR cosine modulated filter bank (CMFB) is used. The purpose of this paper is to present various implementation structures for the EMFBs in a unified framework. The key idea is to use cosine and sine modulated filter banks as building blocks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.7 can be reduced by using a fast-transform algorithm [36,37] whereas for the prototype filter, only N/M multiplications per input/output sample are required. …”
Section: Cosine-modulated Filter Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.7 can be reduced by using a fast-transform algorithm [36,37] whereas for the prototype filter, only N/M multiplications per input/output sample are required. …”
Section: Cosine-modulated Filter Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a PR cosine modulated filter bank (CMFB), N = 2KM− 1whereK is an integer overlapping factor as defined in Viholainen et al (2006). For complex modulated FBs,…”
Section: Modulated Fbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To process a block of M complex-valued input samples and with an overlapping factor K, the M -channel MDFT FB requires M (4K + log 2 M − 3) + 4 real multiplications and M (4K + 3 log 2 M − 1) − 4 real additions [12]. Thus, the total per-sample arithmetic complexity is 8K + 4 log 2 M − 4.…”
Section: Implementation Cost and System Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%