2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2005.03.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient in situ method to determine radionuclide concentration in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of depth distributions of gamma emitting radionuclides has been the subject of several studies in the field of in-situ gamma spectrometry. Mainly three approaches have been proposed: a) the differential attenuation of gamma emission lines as a function of energy, sometimes referred to as the two lines method (Miller et Thummerer and Jacob, 1998); b) the forward scattering or photopeak to valley method, based on the ratio of count-rates in the full energy peak of a specific emission line and the count-rate in the valley between the corresponding Compton edge and the photopeak (Zombori et al, 1992;Tyler et al, 1996;Tyler, 1999Tyler, , 2004Kastlander and Bargholtz, 2005;Tyler and Copplestone, 2007); c) the use of lead plates and/or collimators (Korun et al, 1994;Benke and Kearfott, 2001). While the application of the two first approaches is limited to simple depth distributions of radioelements -e. g. exponential decrease for 137 Cs -the third suffers from the need for repeated measurements and long counting times.…”
Section: Gamma Dose Rate Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of depth distributions of gamma emitting radionuclides has been the subject of several studies in the field of in-situ gamma spectrometry. Mainly three approaches have been proposed: a) the differential attenuation of gamma emission lines as a function of energy, sometimes referred to as the two lines method (Miller et Thummerer and Jacob, 1998); b) the forward scattering or photopeak to valley method, based on the ratio of count-rates in the full energy peak of a specific emission line and the count-rate in the valley between the corresponding Compton edge and the photopeak (Zombori et al, 1992;Tyler et al, 1996;Tyler, 1999Tyler, , 2004Kastlander and Bargholtz, 2005;Tyler and Copplestone, 2007); c) the use of lead plates and/or collimators (Korun et al, 1994;Benke and Kearfott, 2001). While the application of the two first approaches is limited to simple depth distributions of radioelements -e. g. exponential decrease for 137 Cs -the third suffers from the need for repeated measurements and long counting times.…”
Section: Gamma Dose Rate Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of utilising the PVR to account for burial depth was first realised by Zombori et al (1992) and has since been used widely to estimate the burial depth of 137 Cs (Feng et al, 2012;Gering et al, 2002Gering et al, , 1998Kastlander and Bargholtz, 2005;Tyler, 2004). In essence, the PVR is the ratio of the full energy photopeak and the forward scattered photons ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zombori et al (1992) calculated the ratio between the net peak area and these valley counts as a way of estimating the penetration depth of the 137 Cs in radioactive fallout (Zombori, 2012(Zombori, , 2013. Several others have used this method and evaluated the feasibility in different situations (Feng et al, 2009;Gering et al, 1998;Hjerpe and Samuelsson, 2002;Kastlander and Bargholtz, 2005;Panza, 2012;Lemercier, 2007;Tyler, 2004). The contribution in the valley ROI is dependent of detector characteristics, and to further develop the PTV method, a better understanding of contributing factors is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%