2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-018-9389-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Methods for the Estimation of Homogenized Coefficients

Abstract: The main goal of this paper is to define and study new methods for the computation of effective coefficients in the homogenization of divergence-form operators with random coefficients. The methods introduced here are proved to have optimal computational complexity, and are shown numerically to display small constant prefactors. In the spirit of multiscale methods, the main idea is to rely on a progressive coarsening of the problem, which we implement via a generalization of the Green-Kubo formula. The techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A result comparable to Theorem 1.1 was proved in [52] in the context of discrete finitedifference equations. Besides the adaptation to the continuous setting, there are two main differences between the present result and the one obtained in [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A result comparable to Theorem 1.1 was proved in [52] in the context of discrete finitedifference equations. Besides the adaptation to the continuous setting, there are two main differences between the present result and the one obtained in [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A result comparable to Theorem 1.1 was proved in [52] in the context of discrete finitedifference equations. Besides the adaptation to the continuous setting, there are two main differences between the present result and the one obtained in [52]. The first one is that the quantities on the right side of (1.6) are averages against a smooth mask, while only box averages could be handled in [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations