2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vlsi.2011.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient modulo 2 ±1 squarers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1} [9][10][11][12] followed by a two-moduli MRC to include the fourth modulus. The hardware resource and conversion time requirements in terms of basic gates for the proposed reverse converters along with the converters for M1-M3 are also presented using unit-gate model [28] From table 4, it can be observed that for all the standard DRs, among the considered three-and four-moduli sets the design D12 is preferable regarding lower hardware resource requirement and the converter D13 needs least conversion time among all the converters. Among the converters D5-D10 for moduli set M1, the proposed converter D10 needs the lowest hardware resources for DR 8 and 16 bits whereas converter D5 is better for 24-, 32-, 48-and 64-bit DRs.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1} [9][10][11][12] followed by a two-moduli MRC to include the fourth modulus. The hardware resource and conversion time requirements in terms of basic gates for the proposed reverse converters along with the converters for M1-M3 are also presented using unit-gate model [28] From table 4, it can be observed that for all the standard DRs, among the considered three-and four-moduli sets the design D12 is preferable regarding lower hardware resource requirement and the converter D13 needs least conversion time among all the converters. Among the converters D5-D10 for moduli set M1, the proposed converter D10 needs the lowest hardware resources for DR 8 and 16 bits whereas converter D5 is better for 24-, 32-, 48-and 64-bit DRs.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arithmetic units perform their calculations on the k bits of each operand, while zeros are treated in a special way. As a result, the architectures for diminished-one modulo 2 k +1 addition, multiplication and squaring that have been presented [2], [8][9][10], [14], [27], [30] are more delay and/or area efficient than those for the normal encoding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modulo squaring is a special modulo multiplication operation where the multiplicand and the multiplier are identical. By manipulating the redundancy in the partial product matrix, efficient squarer circuits have been proposed in [Verg05], [Mura09a] where the operand bits are non-encoded and [Baka11] where both the multiplicand and multiplier bits are radix-4 Booth encoded. The high radix Booth encoding techniques suggested in this thesis can be extended to modulο 2 n −1, modulo 2 n and modulο 2 n +1 squarer circuits for improved area-delay-power metrics.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%