2015 9th Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iranianmvip.2015.7397518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient multiply-add unit specified for DSPs utilizing low-power pipeline modulo 2n+1 multiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 reveals that the architectures in [12,33,34] consume considerably higher static and average power (in mW) than the proposed SFMAC architecture. The architectures in [35,36] are examined for 16-bit operations at 1 V and 8-bit operations at 1.8 V in 90 and 180 nm technologies. Even though the existing work described in [35,36] requires less power than the proposed SFMAC (the existing circuit's performance analysis is done with a supply voltage less than 2 V, while the SFMAC uses a supply voltage of 2 V), these two existing implementations can only execute MAC operations on unsigned fixed-point numbers.…”
Section: Esc Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 reveals that the architectures in [12,33,34] consume considerably higher static and average power (in mW) than the proposed SFMAC architecture. The architectures in [35,36] are examined for 16-bit operations at 1 V and 8-bit operations at 1.8 V in 90 and 180 nm technologies. Even though the existing work described in [35,36] requires less power than the proposed SFMAC (the existing circuit's performance analysis is done with a supply voltage less than 2 V, while the SFMAC uses a supply voltage of 2 V), these two existing implementations can only execute MAC operations on unsigned fixed-point numbers.…”
Section: Esc Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the existing work described in [35,36] requires less power than the proposed SFMAC (the existing circuit's performance analysis is done with a supply voltage less than 2 V, while the SFMAC uses a supply voltage of 2 V), these two existing implementations can only execute MAC operations on unsigned fixed-point numbers. As a result, the MAC architectures in [35,36] have a restricted scope. Although the architecture defined in [37] is implemented in 180 nm technology with a 1.8 V supply voltage for 16-MAC operation, it consumes substantially more power than the SFMAC architecture.…”
Section: Esc Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delay of the unsigned fixed-point architecture in [27] is lesser than the proposed architecture because the operating frequency of the said architecture is much larger than the proposed SFMAC architecture. The performance of [28,29] are evaluated in 90 nm and 180 nm technologies for 16-bit operations at 1 V and 8-bit operations at 1.8 V respectively. Though, the power consumptions of the existing work mentioned in [28,29] are lesser than proposed SFMAC architecture (the existing circuit՚s performance analysis is performed in supply voltage lesser than 2 V whereas for the SFMAC the supply voltage is 2 V).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of [28,29] are evaluated in 90 nm and 180 nm technologies for 16-bit operations at 1 V and 8-bit operations at 1.8 V respectively. Though, the power consumptions of the existing work mentioned in [28,29] are lesser than proposed SFMAC architecture (the existing circuit՚s performance analysis is performed in supply voltage lesser than 2 V whereas for the SFMAC the supply voltage is 2 V). Still, these two existing architectures are capable of performing the MAC operation on a fixed point unsigned number only.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation