2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient neighborhood search for the one-machine earliness–tardiness scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for efficiency reasons, neighborhood search or branchand-bound algorithms often rely on the job sequence instead of using the schedule. For instance, most neighborhoods used in the literature are based on the permutation of jobs in the sequence [1][2][3]. The timing procedure must be called for each iteration and, therefore, has to be done efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for efficiency reasons, neighborhood search or branchand-bound algorithms often rely on the job sequence instead of using the schedule. For instance, most neighborhoods used in the literature are based on the permutation of jobs in the sequence [1][2][3]. The timing procedure must be called for each iteration and, therefore, has to be done efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis and Kanet [7] presented and demonstrated an efficient timetabling procedure which can be embedded in an enumerative algorithm allowing the search to be conducted over the domain of job permutations for these problems. Hendel and Sourd [11] considered a new approach that efficiently searches in a large neighborhood and always returns a solution for which the timing is optimal in this area. Hoogeveen and Van De Velde [12] investigated single machine problem of scheduling n independent jobs to minimize the sum of α times total completion time and β times total earliness with β > α which can be rewritten as an earliness-tardiness problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, efficient implementations for the standard neighborhoods are possible, as discussed inIbaraki et al (2005),Hendel and Sourd (2006),Ibaraki et al (2008),Kedad-Sidhoum and Sourd (2010), because each solution in a standard neighborhood can be obtained by reconnecting at most four paths. It is not difficult to see that the travel cost and the violation of the capacity constraints of a neighborhood solution (at least for the standard neighborhoods) can be computed in O(1) time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%