With the aim to design water-soluble organometallic Ru(II)
complexes
acting as anticancer agents catalyzing transfer hydrogenation (TH)
reactions with biomolecules, we have synthesized four Ru(II) monocarbonyl
complexes (1–4), featuring the 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane
(dppb) ligand and different bidentate nitrogen (N∧N) ligands, of general formula [Ru(OAc)CO(dppb)(N∧N)]
n
(n = +1, 0; OAc
= acetate). The compounds have been characterized by different methods,
including 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopies, electrochemistry,
as well as single-crystal X-ray diffraction in the case of 1 and 4. The compounds have also been studied for their
hydrolysis in an aqueous environment and for the catalytic regioselective
reduction of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) to
1,4-dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1,4-NADH) in aqueous
solution with sodium formate as a hydride source. Moreover, the stoichiometric
and catalytic oxidation of 1,4-NADH have also been investigated by
UV–visible spectrophotometry and NMR spectroscopy. The results
suggest that the catalytic cycle can start directly from the intact
Ru(II) compound or from its aquo/hydroxo species (in the case of 1–3) to afford the hydride ruthenium complex.
Overall, initial structure–activity relationships could be
inferred which point toward the influence of the extension of the
aromatic N∧N ligand in the cationic complexes 1–3 on TH in both reduction/oxidation
processes. While complex 3 is the most active in TH from
NADH to O2, the neutral complex 4, featuring
a picolinamidate N∧N ligand, stands out as the most
active catalyst for the reduction of NAD+, while being
completely inactive toward NADH oxidation. The compound can also convert
pyruvate into lactate in the presence of formate, albeit with scarce
efficiency. In any case, for all compounds, Ru(II) hydride intermediates
could be observed and even isolated in the case of complexes 1–3. Together, insights from the kinetic
and electrochemical characterization suggest that, in the case of
Ru(II) complexes 1–3, catalytic NADH
oxidation sees the H-transfer from 1,4-NADH as the rate-limiting step,
whereas for NAD+ hydrogenation with formate as the H-donor,
the rate-limiting step is the transfer of the ruthenium hydride to
the NAD+ substrate, as also suggested by density functional
theory (DFT) calculations. Compound 4, stable with respect
to hydrolysis in aqueous solution, appears to operate via a different
mechanism with respect to the other derivatives. Finally, the anticancer
activity and ability to form reactive oxygen species (ROS) of complexes 1–3 have been studied in cancerous and
nontumorigenic cells in vitro. Noteworthy, the conversion
of aldehydes to alcohols could be achieved by the three Ru(II) catalysts
in living cells, as assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Furthermore,
the formation of Ru(II) hydride intermediate upon treatment of cancer
cell extracts with complex 3 has been detected by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Overall, this study paves the way to the
application of non-arene-based org...