“…A classic device structure of a Pe-QLED is anode/hole injection layer/hole transport layer (HTL)/emission layer/electron transport layer (ETL)/electron injection later/cathode. Organic polymers, such as poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA) or poly[ N , N ′-bis(4-butylphenyl)- N , N ′-bis(phenyl)benzidene] (poly-TPD) are commonly used HTMs in Pe-QLEDs due to their high hole mobility exceeding 10 –3 cm 2 ·V –1 ·s –1 . , However, the electron mobility of widely used electron-transporting material (ETM) 1,3,5-tris(1-phenyl-1 H -benzimidazol-2-yl)benzene ( TPBi ) in Pe-QLEDs is approximately 1 × 10 –5 cm 2 ·V –1 ·s –1 , which is 2 orders of magnitude lower than the hole mobility of PTAA or poly-TPD. − This extremely nonequivalent charge carrier capacity of the two charge transport layers will make serious unbalanced charge injection in Pe-QLED devices. The excess charges triggered by the imbalanced charge injection accumulate at the interface, which would produce luminescence quenching through capture by defects or the Auger recombination process, thereby significantly hindering the device efficiency and stability. ,− In order to achieve fast and balanced carrier injection, ETMs with high electron mobilities, such as 4,6-bis(3,5-di(pyridine-3-yl)-2-methylpyrimidine (B3PYMPM) and 2,4,6-tris[3-(diphenylphosphinyl)phenyl]-1,3,5-triazine (PO-T2T) selected from the organic LEDs, have also been reported in Pe-QLEDs, and good device performance has been obtained.…”