2018 International Conference on Advancement in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICAEEE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icaeee.2018.8642983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Noise Reduction and HOG Feature Extraction for Sign Language Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To realize non-continuous recognition, there are some studies, such as the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method [16], SVM [17], and sparse Bayesian classification of feature vectors generated from motion gradient orientation images extracted from input videos [18]. To realize sign language recognition for non-continuous and non-time-series data, there are some works such as the method of k-NN [19], similarity calculation using Euclidean distance [20], cosine similarity [19][21], ANN [22], SVM [23], and convolutional neural network (CNN) [24]. Reference [25] provides a research survey on recognizing emotions from body gestures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realize non-continuous recognition, there are some studies, such as the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method [16], SVM [17], and sparse Bayesian classification of feature vectors generated from motion gradient orientation images extracted from input videos [18]. To realize sign language recognition for non-continuous and non-time-series data, there are some works such as the method of k-NN [19], similarity calculation using Euclidean distance [20], cosine similarity [19][21], ANN [22], SVM [23], and convolutional neural network (CNN) [24]. Reference [25] provides a research survey on recognizing emotions from body gestures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes aimed to extract features from static images or simple video clips of the relevant signs. SLR was performed using various traditional classification algorithms based on features extracted from sign language letters, numbers, or words using feature extraction techniques such as Hough Transform [11], Contour Analysis [12], Local Binary Pattern [13,14], Gabor Filter [15], HOG [16,17], SIFT [18,19], SURF [20], optical flow [21], Dynamic Time Warping [22], Hidden Markov Models [23,24], and temporal accumulative features [25]. Methods based on handcrafted features and traditional machine learning techniques, while effective for a predefined and limited number of signs, typically struggle to recognize new or rare signs due to their limited flexibility and generalization ability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, the main flow of HOG algorithm implementation was provided. Mahmud et al [21] employed HOG to feature extraction and utilized k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) to classify American sign language. This method provides superior accuracy (94.23%) to the compared approach (86%).…”
Section: Histogram Of Oriented Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%