Efficient preprocessing of complex geometries for CFD simulations

Abstract

Preprocessing remains one the main bottlenecks in the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of flows involving complex geometries as advances in the algorithm development, turbulence modeling and parallel computing are made. To this end, two approaches are presented here to efficiently deal with complex geometries in order to reduce the preprocessing time and manual effort. First, a hybrid blocking approach, combining the medial axis based method with level set iso-surface is presented to aid the block topology generation for subsequent structured meshing of complex 3D external flow domains. Secondly, a hierarchical geometry handling approach is demonstrated which makes use of the lower order modeling, overset meshes and zonal blocking for efficient preprocessing. Typical external aerodynamics cases have been showcased to describe how such techniques can be used to address modern challenges in the preparation of complex geometries for flow simulations.

On the Characteristics of Natural Hydraulic Dampers: An Image-Based Approach to Study the Fluid Flow Behaviour Inside the Human Meniscal Tissue

“…Navier-Stokes equations are a series of partial differential equations describing the motion of fluids, taking into account fluid viscosity, density, and pressure. This method is often used as a benchmark although it is sensitive to the meshing quality and grid simplifications that are inevitable for intricate geometries [28] . The relatively new Lattice Boltzmann method appears to be a promising approach for modelling fluid flow in porous media.…”

Development of Building CFD Model Design Process Based on BIM

“…Each process is a significant factor in determining the accuracy of CFD simulation results. Moreover, pre-processing is the most time-consuming process for flow simulation [6]. Therefore, it is necessary to design the appropriate CFD model.…”

“…Hence, it is necessary to improve grid quality through geometry simplification [23]. However, geometry simplification takes a considerable amount of time because it entails much manual work [6]. Grid optimization also requires considerable trial and error to improve grid quality, and therefore, is a time-consuming process.…”

Building Geometry Simplification for Improving Mesh Quality of Numerical Analysis Model

“…As the fine features and complexity of the geometry adversely affect the mesh design, a geometry simplification is commonly used as a preprocessing step to improve the mesh quality of the model [10]. Among the numerical analysis processes, the simplification of a complex geometry requires a great deal of manual work and is time-consuming [11]. In addition, the geometry simplification needs to be repeated manually until the target accuracy is achieved.…”