2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient procedure to remove ECG from sEMG with limited deteriorations: Extraction, quasi-periodic detection and cancellation

Abstract: The interpretations of the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals from the trunk region are strongly distorted by the heart activity (ECG), especially in case of low-amplitude EMG responses analyses. Many methods have been investigated to resolve this nontrivial problem, by using advanced data processing on the overall sEMG recorded signal. However, if they reduce ECG artifacts, those cancellation methods also deteriorate noiseless parts of the signal. This work proposes an original ECG cancellation method de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signals were filtered using the FieldTrip toolbox with a band frequency of 0.5-40 Hz. Different kinds of noise such as the power frequency, electro-oculogram (EOG) (Geetha and Geethalakshmi, 2012), electro-myogram (EMG) (Mortezaee et al, 2019), electro-cardiogram (ECG) (Nougarou et al, 2018), and galvanic skin response (GSR) (Sun et al, 2019) were removed in EEG signals. The statistical computations were performed using statistical product and service solutions (SPSS).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signals were filtered using the FieldTrip toolbox with a band frequency of 0.5-40 Hz. Different kinds of noise such as the power frequency, electro-oculogram (EOG) (Geetha and Geethalakshmi, 2012), electro-myogram (EMG) (Mortezaee et al, 2019), electro-cardiogram (ECG) (Nougarou et al, 2018), and galvanic skin response (GSR) (Sun et al, 2019) were removed in EEG signals. The statistical computations were performed using statistical product and service solutions (SPSS).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…removing the ECG artifact, can be processed through several different simple or more complex approaches [37]. High-pass frequency filters (HPF) [38], ECG subtraction through QRS-complex detection (FAS) [39], adaptive filtering (AF) approaches [40,41], ICA based approaches [42,43] and also combined AF-ICA based methods [44]. Here in this toolbox however, we promise to stick with the simple and fast methods and thus, implement a modified high-pass frequency filtering approach not only to gain from the simplicity but to also improve the performance accuracy of removing ECG artifact from EMG signals.…”
Section: Emg Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the recognition of EMG signals is usually difficult due to the complex nature of the signal itself [6]. Additionally, EMG signals often contaminated by the heart electrical activity, motion artifact and noise [7], [8]. In such case, signal processing is preferred for analyzing the EMG signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%