2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00778-018-0496-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient provenance tracking for datalog using top-k queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as to Datalog programs used in previous works [5]. The performance of the implementation competes with dedicated solutions specific to graph databases [25].…”
Section: Xx:3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…as well as to Datalog programs used in previous works [5]. The performance of the implementation competes with dedicated solutions specific to graph databases [25].…”
Section: Xx:3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where keeping the full provenance of a program (how-provenance) is still prohibitively large, [5,4] propose to select only a relevant subset of such trees using selection criteria based on tree patterns and ranking over rules and facts occurring in the derivation. First, given a Datalog program P and a pattern q, an offline instrumentation is performed, leading to an instrumented program P q .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Semiring provenance has also been studied for Datalog queries, for which it was defined based on the set of all derivation trees for the query (Green, Karvounarakis, and Tannen 2007;Deutch et al 2014;Deutch, Gilad, and Moskovitch 2018). However, this definition seems less axiomatic than in the case of relational databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%