2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient removal of polybrominated diphenyl ethers from soil washing effluent by dummy molecular imprinted adsorbents: Selectivity and mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the surface tension of the water is not reduced enough to allow for effective mixing with the contaminants. As the concentration of surfactant increases, more contaminants are solubilized and removed from the soil 28 , 29 . However, at high concentrations, surfactants can become less effective due to factors such as foam formation or precipitation of the surfactant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the surface tension of the water is not reduced enough to allow for effective mixing with the contaminants. As the concentration of surfactant increases, more contaminants are solubilized and removed from the soil 28 , 29 . However, at high concentrations, surfactants can become less effective due to factors such as foam formation or precipitation of the surfactant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to optimize the concentration of surfactant used in soil washing processes to ensure maximum efficiency while avoiding negative effects such as foam formation or precipitation. This optimization process may involve testing different concentrations of surfactant on contaminated soil samples and monitoring their effectiveness in removing contaminants 29 . Prior studies have found various levels of surfactants as the most favorable concentration, which is influenced by the kind and amount of pollutants in the soil, the type of surfactant and the retention time of the process 30 , 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%