2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient removal of uranium (VI) by 3D hierarchical Mg/Fe-LDH supported nanoscale hydroxyapatite: A synthetic experimental and mechanism studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To clarify the reaction order and adsorption mechanism of the adsorption process of ZnAl-LDO-BC, the following adsorption kinetics models were adopted: pseudo-first-order (PFO, formula ), pseudo-second-order (PSO, formula ), and intraparticle diffusion model (IPD, formula ). , where Q e and Q t (mg/g) are the theoretical adsorption capacity and adsorption capacity at time t , respectively; k 1 , k 2 , and k 3 are the PFO, PSO, and IPD constants, respectively; and C is the boundary effect constant, wherein a larger value indicates more stability.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify the reaction order and adsorption mechanism of the adsorption process of ZnAl-LDO-BC, the following adsorption kinetics models were adopted: pseudo-first-order (PFO, formula ), pseudo-second-order (PSO, formula ), and intraparticle diffusion model (IPD, formula ). , where Q e and Q t (mg/g) are the theoretical adsorption capacity and adsorption capacity at time t , respectively; k 1 , k 2 , and k 3 are the PFO, PSO, and IPD constants, respectively; and C is the boundary effect constant, wherein a larger value indicates more stability.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new strong double peak for the antisymmetric vibration of [O=UVI=O] 2+ appeared in the XPS spectra of the HAP@CoFe2O4 reacted with U(VI), which was consistent with the EDS elemental mapping results (Figure S1), suggesting that uranium was successfully adsorbed on the surface of the material. The high resolution of the U 4f spectrum (Figure 5b) can be well fitted at binding energies of 383.3 (U 4f7/2) and 394.0 eV (U 4f5/2), indicating that the valence of uranium did not change during the adsorption process [55,56]. The Co spectrum (Figure S2a) revealed two peaks at binding energies 782.58 and 786.84 eV, which were attributed to Co 2p3/2 and its shake-up satellites, respectively, whereas peaks at higher binding energies (~797.81 and 804.44 eV) corresponded to Co 2p1/2 and their shakeup satellites, respectively [57].…”
Section: U(vi) Removal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Meanwhile, the high intensity double-peaking concerned with the antisymmetric vibration of [O = U(VI)= O] 2+ , which can be observed in the XPS spectra after U(VI) adsorption. Through deconvolution of U(VI) peaks, the tting results of U 4f 7/2 and U 4f 5/2 appeared at approximately 381.9 eV and 392.8 eV for HAP after U(VI) adsorption, indicating no existence of oxidation and reduction during the adsorption process(Ahmed et al, 2021;Guo et al, 2020). Contrarily, the U 4f spectra of HAP@CMK-3 after adsorption can be resolved into U 4f 5/2…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%