2012
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2011.0274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient resonant-type transformer inrush current limiter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some structures or control algorithms in the literature [15], which limit start‐up or switching inrush current of converters [16–18]. Generally, inrush‐current limiters for different applications, such as induction machines [19, 20], power transformers [21, 22], and capacitor banks switching [2325], can be divided into two major categories: (i) Approaches based on the insertion of initial impedance. (ii) Approaches based on synchronised switching. Series reactor type limiters [26, 27], insertion and bypassing a limiting resistor and/or inductor [28], active switches in the linear region of operation [29–31] and power electronics‐based methods are subsets of the first group. Although a fixed reactor would limit the initial inrush current, it may result in system resonance and increase the required voltage rating of the capacitor [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some structures or control algorithms in the literature [15], which limit start‐up or switching inrush current of converters [16–18]. Generally, inrush‐current limiters for different applications, such as induction machines [19, 20], power transformers [21, 22], and capacitor banks switching [2325], can be divided into two major categories: (i) Approaches based on the insertion of initial impedance. (ii) Approaches based on synchronised switching. Series reactor type limiters [26, 27], insertion and bypassing a limiting resistor and/or inductor [28], active switches in the linear region of operation [29–31] and power electronics‐based methods are subsets of the first group. Although a fixed reactor would limit the initial inrush current, it may result in system resonance and increase the required voltage rating of the capacitor [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B‐4 DC‐reactor type ICL [17–21]. In [22], the deficiencies and benefits of above‐mentioned inrush current suppression approaches are discussed. Except for the DC‐reactor type, the remainders are not industrially applicable due to complexity in design, use of specific materials and high cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%