2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient screen printed perovskite solar cells based on mesoscopic TiO2/Al2O3/NiO/carbon architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
188
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
188
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cell was completed by infiltrating the perovskite through the carbon electrode filling the whole triple layer mesoporous stack delivering an efficiency of 12.8% and remarkable stability over 1000 h of full sunlight. 48 The specified thicknesses (≥1 µm) are those typically seen in screen printed layers even though thicknesses down to a few hundred nms can be achieved (the very thin compact layer, ≤100 nm, is typically still deposited via other techniques such as spray pyrolysis 48 or ALD 45 ) as demonstrated in the quadruple stacks by Cao et al 49 There, an additional 800 nm mesoporous nickel oxide interlayer was screen printed just underneath the 10 µm carbon black/graphite to improve charge collection and reduce charge recombination resulting in a PCE of 15%. A similar architecture (and PCE) had been fabricated by Xu et al via blade coating the layers.…”
Section: Screen Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell was completed by infiltrating the perovskite through the carbon electrode filling the whole triple layer mesoporous stack delivering an efficiency of 12.8% and remarkable stability over 1000 h of full sunlight. 48 The specified thicknesses (≥1 µm) are those typically seen in screen printed layers even though thicknesses down to a few hundred nms can be achieved (the very thin compact layer, ≤100 nm, is typically still deposited via other techniques such as spray pyrolysis 48 or ALD 45 ) as demonstrated in the quadruple stacks by Cao et al 49 There, an additional 800 nm mesoporous nickel oxide interlayer was screen printed just underneath the 10 µm carbon black/graphite to improve charge collection and reduce charge recombination resulting in a PCE of 15%. A similar architecture (and PCE) had been fabricated by Xu et al via blade coating the layers.…”
Section: Screen Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43] Influence of the sheet resistance increase can be largely overcome by optimizing the device structure for single cells, for example, depositing 100 nm thick Au busbar under the electron transport layer [44] or designing suitable device geometry, for example, tuning the width of the subcells and optimizing the interconnection between subcells for modules. [45] Fabrication techniques such as hybrid chemical vapor deposition (CVD), [46][47][48][49] spray coating, [50,51] screen printing, [52,53] and hot casting [54,55] have been developed and shown promising results in achieving large-area uniformity and easy accessibility. However, most large-area single cell/module optimization is based on MAPbI 3 and FAPbI 3 , which are known to suffer from the instability issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11] The instability of devices in operation conditions mainly comes from the degradation of perovskite materials. [12][13][14] Moisture, UV light, and temperature are susceptible to cause degradation of organic-inorganic perovskite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%