2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3dt01022h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient separation of CO2 from CH4 and N2 in an ultra-stable microporous metal–organic framework

Chaohui He,
Peng Zhang,
Sai Ma
et al.

Abstract: Efficient separation of CO2 from CH4 and N2 is essential for the upgrading of biogas and reducing carbon emissions in flue gas, but is challenging in the energy chemistry industry....

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sharp contrast to N 2 , the CO 2 adsorption exhibits type I isotherms for all the MOFs with an uptake amount of 5.34 mmol/g (119.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 4.33 mmol/g (96.9 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 2.54 mmol/g (56.9 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 at 195 K, and the BET surface area of 449, 408, and 253 m 2 /g, respectively. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the case of various reported functionalized MOFs. Upon performing the CO 2 adsorption analysis at 273 K, the carbon dioxide uptake amount decreased to 2.12 mmol/g (47.5 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 2.17 mmol/g (48.6 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 1.41 mmol/g (31.6 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 , and at room temperature (298 K) the values were around 1.46 mmol/g (32.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 1.62 mmol/g (36.3 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 0.88 mmol/g (19.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 (Figure A–C). The higher CO 2 uptake values and higher surface areas can be credited to the presence of both halogen and carboxylate groups of the ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In sharp contrast to N 2 , the CO 2 adsorption exhibits type I isotherms for all the MOFs with an uptake amount of 5.34 mmol/g (119.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 4.33 mmol/g (96.9 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 2.54 mmol/g (56.9 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 at 195 K, and the BET surface area of 449, 408, and 253 m 2 /g, respectively. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the case of various reported functionalized MOFs. Upon performing the CO 2 adsorption analysis at 273 K, the carbon dioxide uptake amount decreased to 2.12 mmol/g (47.5 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 2.17 mmol/g (48.6 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 1.41 mmol/g (31.6 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 , and at room temperature (298 K) the values were around 1.46 mmol/g (32.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 1 , 1.62 mmol/g (36.3 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 2 , and 0.88 mmol/g (19.7 cm 3 g –1 STP) for MOF 3 (Figure A–C). The higher CO 2 uptake values and higher surface areas can be credited to the presence of both halogen and carboxylate groups of the ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As significant classes of crystal porous solid materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers (PCPs) have appeared as promising materials for the separation of various gases. 13–19 MOFs have attracted particular attention because of their abundant structural diversity and design flexibility, providing remarkable sorption behavior. 20–25 In this regard, many microporous MOFs that can selectively take up acetylene from other gases that possess similar physical properties, such as carbon dioxide or ethylene, have recently been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Prominently, the CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of Cu-TZDB at 298 K is higher than many well-known MOF materials, such as SIFSIX-2-Cu-i 12 ( S = 140), HKUST-1 7 ( S = 101), ZJNU-29 35 (93.6), NJU-Bai21 36 ( S = 91), ZnMOF-74 37 (87.7), LIFM-11(Cu) 38 (81.9), FJUT-4 39 (69.3), UTSA-85a 40 (62.5), Y-bptc 41 (62), ZIF-78 9,37 (41.4), HNUST-1 42 ( S = 39.8), and SYSU 43 ( S = 34.2) etc. , slightly lower than Mg-MOF-74 16 ( S = 182.1), but still lower than some famous MOFs of SIFSIX-3-Zn 12 (1818), NJU-Bai52 44 ( S = 581), Zn 2 (bpdc) 2 (bpee) 45 ( S = 493.8), mmen-CuBTTri 14 ( S = 327), and UTSA-16 15 ( S = 314.7) (Table S2†).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%