1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00032107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient separation of subfossil Chironomidae from lake sediments

Abstract: The efficiency of recovering subfossil chironomid head capsules from lake sediments was investigated using a variety of methods. Preparation of the sediment by boiling in 10% KOH and washing in a 37 pm sieve, as compared to unprepared sediment, did not affect the number of head capsules recovered per volume of sediment. Sieves having meshes greater than 100 I.rrn lose many of the smaller head capsules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub-samples were sieved using 233 µm and 85 µm sieve, respectively (WALKER & PATERSON, 1985). The fraction retained on the sieve was manually sorted at 7-40 magnifications in a counting tray.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub-samples were sieved using 233 µm and 85 µm sieve, respectively (WALKER & PATERSON, 1985). The fraction retained on the sieve was manually sorted at 7-40 magnifications in a counting tray.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fossil diatom assemblages were analysed quantitatively in aqueous suspensions of undigested sediment (Kling 1998). Sample processing for fossil midge analysis followed standard techniques (Walker & Patterson 1985), using a 100 µm sieve to extract fossils from the sediment matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined the effect of different mesh sizes on chironomid sample processing. However, these studies mainly examined the effect of mesh size on the representativeness of chironomid assemblages identified and enumerated under the light microscope (Walker and Paterson 1985;Verschuren and Eggermont 2007) and no studies are available that document the effects of the mesh size used during sieving on the sorting time of chironomid samples. In this study we assess the effect of mesh size on fossil chironomid sample mass and processing time, with the aim of providing a recommendation for the most time-efficient mesh size to be used to concentrate fossil chironomids for stable isotope analyses and AMS radiocarbon dating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the commonly used ~100 µm mesh size for sieving sediments is based on the observation by Walker and Paterson (1985) that most head capsules are larger than 100 µm in diameter and thus retained on a 100 µm sieve. Even the sorting of 50-100 head capsules per sample commonly used in palaeoecological analyses can take an analyst several hours for sediments with large amounts of obscuring debris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%