2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient SF6/N2 separation at high pressures using a zirconium-based mesoporous metal–organic framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Kim M.B. et al55 studied SF 6 /N 2 separation in UIO-66 and UIO-67 MOFs and NaX zeolite, which was also reported by Dunne et al…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Kim M.B. et al55 studied SF 6 /N 2 separation in UIO-66 and UIO-67 MOFs and NaX zeolite, which was also reported by Dunne et al…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…More recently, Kim M.B. et al studied SF 6 /N 2 separation in UIO-66 and UIO-67 MOFs and NaX zeolite, which was also reported by Dunne et al The adsorption capacity of UIO-66 and NaX is about 2 mol/kg of SF 6 , while UIO-67 shows the highest adsorption capacity reaching 9 mol/kg. This is attributed to the very large pores of about 23 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Over the past decades, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted great attention owing to their highly tunable structural and chemical features. In contrast to the prototypical greenhouse gas CO 2 , only a few studies have been reported on MOFs for the selective SF 6 capture over N 2 . ,, So far, UiO-66-Br 2 is the best selective MOF under industrially relevant working conditions (SF 6 :N 2 = 10:90 and room temperature), showing an ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST)-predicted SF 6 /N 2 selectivity of 220; however, its SF 6 uptake at 1.0 bar as single component is extremely low (0.93 mmol g –1 ) . Meanwhile, MOF-74­(Mg) exhibits the highest pure SF 6 uptake (6.42 mmol g –1 ) at 1.0 bar associated with a low IAST SF 6 /N 2 selectivity (19.0) and relatively low SF 6 uptake (1.82 mmol g –1 ) in the mixture case at 1.0 bar .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3a shows the IAST-predicted selectivity for SF 6 /N 2 (SF 6 /N 2 = 1/9) mixtures on the three MOFs. The predicted selectivity of SF 6 /N 2 for Ni(ina) 2 reached an unprecedented 375.1-higher than any other material reported to date (Table S1), including Cu-MOF-NH 2 (266.2), [12] HKUST-1 (70.4), [15] SBMOF-1 (325), [9] UiO-66 (127.8), [13] UiO-66-Br 2 (220.0), [13] UiO-66-Zr (74), [19] CAU-17 (31.0), [17] MOF-74(Zn) (46.0), [8] MOF-74(Co) (40), [8] MOF-74(Mg) (32.0), [8] MIL-100(Fe) granule (25), [11] UiO-67 (21.6) [14] and MIL-100(Fe) (24.4). [11] The IASTpredicted SF 6 /N 2 (SF 6 /N 2 = 1/9) selectivities of Ni(pba) 2 and Cu(peba) 2 samples reached 200.6 and 18.2 at 298 K and 100 kPa, respectively.…”
Section: Forschungsartikelmentioning
confidence: 99%