2019
DOI: 10.1101/628453
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient small-world and scale-free functional brain networks at rest using k-nearest neighbors thresholding

Abstract: indicates a shared first-authorship Highlights. A novel thresholding method for brain networks based on k-nearest neighbors (kNN)  kNN applied on resting state fMRI from a big cohort of healthy subjects BASE-II  kNN built networks present greater small world properties than density threshold  kNN built networks present scale-free properties whereas density threshold did not AbstractIn recent years, there has been a massive effort to analyze the topological properties of brain networks. Yet, one of the chal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current finding of Weibull distribution fits brain networks better is in line with previous reports of the nodal degree of human brain functional networks that follow short-tailed distribution such as the Weibull distribution and the power law with exponential cutoff (Nakamura et al, 2009;Hayasaka and Laurienti, 2010;Gupta and Rajapakse, 2018;Zucca et al, 2019). In contrast, the heavy-tailed power law distribution (also called scale-free network) has been extensively discussed (Eguíluz et al, 2005;Van Den Heuvel et al, 2008;Ciuciu et al, 2014;Hanson et al, 2016;Forlim et al, 2019). Most of these studies on the power law had a strong hypothesis that brain networks are structured with simple growth mechanisms, such as preferential attachment (Barabási and Albert, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The current finding of Weibull distribution fits brain networks better is in line with previous reports of the nodal degree of human brain functional networks that follow short-tailed distribution such as the Weibull distribution and the power law with exponential cutoff (Nakamura et al, 2009;Hayasaka and Laurienti, 2010;Gupta and Rajapakse, 2018;Zucca et al, 2019). In contrast, the heavy-tailed power law distribution (also called scale-free network) has been extensively discussed (Eguíluz et al, 2005;Van Den Heuvel et al, 2008;Ciuciu et al, 2014;Hanson et al, 2016;Forlim et al, 2019). Most of these studies on the power law had a strong hypothesis that brain networks are structured with simple growth mechanisms, such as preferential attachment (Barabási and Albert, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From a theoretical point of view, it is plausible that the brain has evolved to minimize the energetic costs of information processing and therefore maximize efficiency and redirect its function in an adaptive manner, that is, resilience. A brain network with such characteristics, when characterized by graphical analysis, would present small-world and scale-free network properties (Forlim et al, 2019).…”
Section: Large-scale Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such networks accurately describe the structure of various knowledge organisations, such as the World Wide Web, and social networks that organise knowledge such as academic citations (Barabási & Bonabeau, 2003). While the structure of the human brain is not fully known, there is evidence that its networks, too, resemble a scale-free network (Eguíluz et al, 2005), which can help to explain the brain's efficiency and plasticity (Forlim et al, 2019).…”
Section: How Content Compression Enhances Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%