2019 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icit48102.2019.00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [51], the authors suggested a HAR framework using a CNN architecture for the "UCI-HAR" public dataset. Moreover, the authors calculated the training and testing times of their approach as 3.4274 seconds and 372.6 ms, respectively.…”
Section: A Deep Learning For Harmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [51], the authors suggested a HAR framework using a CNN architecture for the "UCI-HAR" public dataset. Moreover, the authors calculated the training and testing times of their approach as 3.4274 seconds and 372.6 ms, respectively.…”
Section: A Deep Learning For Harmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the UCI-HAR dataset, we perform exhaustive experiments on various DL approaches, such as a CNN, LSTM, an AE, CNN-LSTM, a convolutional AE, and the proposed method (ConvAE-LSTM). [51], where the computational times for training and testing are 3.4274 s and 372.6 ms, respectively, when using the CNN with the UCI dataset. The testing accuracy of ConvAE-LSTM is 98.14%, which is much higher than that of other popular DL approaches.…”
Section: ) Uci Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the present study only required 600 iterations to obtain superior accuracy. Reference [32], like us, used CNN, but we differed from it in that after research we excluded the pooling layers and obtained higher accuracy.…”
Section: H the Comparisons Of Several Models Of The Open Datasetmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After 10 repetitions, the average accuracy of the open database was 95.08%, and the mean accuracy of the database we recorded was 87.88%. [20] 93.70% LSTM-CNN [28] 95.78% Bidir-LSTM [31] 93.79% EHARS [32] 93.92% CNN-LSTM [33] 92.13% CNN-LSTM [34] 93.40% Ours 95.99%…”
Section: G K-fold Cross-validation In Both Open Dataset and Data Thimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple layers in the network, the deep learning procedure identifies optimal features from the raw data itself, without human intervention [ 20 ]. Some studies show that this approach can yield highly accurate results in activity classification [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, there are limitations and challenges in the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%