Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2966986.2980077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient statistical validation of machine learning systems for autonomous driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For degenerate metrics 𝑔 0 , non-zero tangent vectors can have zero length, since 𝑔 0 (𝑣, 𝑣) = 0. 5 Weijing Shi et al [26] state that a misclassification probability of 𝑝 ≈ 10 −12 would require a sample size of 𝑛 ≈ 10 13 .…”
Section: Then Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For degenerate metrics 𝑔 0 , non-zero tangent vectors can have zero length, since 𝑔 0 (𝑣, 𝑣) = 0. 5 Weijing Shi et al [26] state that a misclassification probability of 𝑝 ≈ 10 −12 would require a sample size of 𝑛 ≈ 10 13 .…”
Section: Then Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [77] studies a use case of an object detection system that uses ML algorithms and provides an efficient approach to validate the system. For an image recognition algorithm to function properly in safety-critical automotive applications, a failure rate as small as 10 −12 should be achieved.…”
Section: B Challenges In Assessing Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, simulation approaches should be used, which in turn generates high costs if the model of the system is required to be accurate. To reduce validation cost in such a system, reference [77] proposes an approach of subset sampling in which the objective is to estimate the failure rate of an ML algorithm in an AV in terms of different probabilities. By experimenting within the use case of STOP sign detection,…”
Section: B Challenges In Assessing Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any visual perception system based on machine learning cannot be 100 [2]. Hence, the system may fail for a specific input pattern and accurately estimating its failure rate can be extremely time-consuming [3]. One can affirm in this case that the AI will not be necessary better than humans, and could induce accidents that humans could have avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%