2019
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201901422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Synthesis by Mono‐Carboxy Methylation of 4,4′‐Biphenol, X‐ray Diffraction, Spectroscopic Characterization and Computational Study of the Crystal Packing of Ethyl 2‐((4′‐hydroxy‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4‐yl)oxy)acetate

Abstract: Herein, mono‐carboxy methylation of 4,4′‐Biphenol was accomplished to give ethyl 2‐((4′‐hydroxy‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4‐yl)oxy)acetate (EBPA). The chemical structure of EBPA was determined using single crystal XRD and characterized by FT‐IR, UV‐Visible, 1H‐NMR, EIMS and elemental analysis. Additionally, computational studies of EBPA were performed using density functional theory (DFT) at M06‐2X/6‐311+G(d,p) and B3LYP/6‐311+G(d,p) levels of theory to get optimized structures and countercheck the experimental findings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FMO analysis is mostly used to explain different properties like reactivity, molecular interactions, electronic features, chemical stability, and charge transfer in different compounds. Various chemists and physicists have exercised FMO investigation to expose the structural and geometrical characteristics of investigated systems. The aptitude of a molecule to donate or accept the charge density is estimated through FMOs (HOMO and LUMO) energies. , Moreover, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO ( E g = E LUMO – E HOMO ) is a key sign for nonlinear optical behavior of a compound and also used to gauge several parameters including chemical reactivity, ionization potential, chemical hardness, and chemical softness. A compound is considered soft, least stable, and highly reactive if it has a narrow HOMO–LUMO energy gap and vice versa. , FMO results of 1–4 are presented in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMO analysis is mostly used to explain different properties like reactivity, molecular interactions, electronic features, chemical stability, and charge transfer in different compounds. Various chemists and physicists have exercised FMO investigation to expose the structural and geometrical characteristics of investigated systems. The aptitude of a molecule to donate or accept the charge density is estimated through FMOs (HOMO and LUMO) energies. , Moreover, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO ( E g = E LUMO – E HOMO ) is a key sign for nonlinear optical behavior of a compound and also used to gauge several parameters including chemical reactivity, ionization potential, chemical hardness, and chemical softness. A compound is considered soft, least stable, and highly reactive if it has a narrow HOMO–LUMO energy gap and vice versa. , FMO results of 1–4 are presented in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NBO study provides the Lewis structures, atomic charge, hybridization, and diverse bonds (dative, ionic, covalent, ) [ 28 , 50 ]. The stabilization energy E (2) with a second-order perturbation method is calculated using Equation (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, non-centrosymmetric organic compounds show a second-order nonlinear polarizability response [ 22 ]. Specifically, the compounds consisting of electron donor (D) and electron acceptor (A) moieties connected by a π-conjugated bridge led to a considerable increment in the ICT process [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Consequently, the transfer of electron density from D to A units via a π-bridge imparts NLO properties to D-π-A organic compounds [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBO analysis made use of the second-order perturbation energies E (2) [donor (i)!acceptor (j)] that comprised imperative delocalization interactions, calculated via Equation 2. [29] In NBO Fock matrix, ε i and ε j are the off-diagonal and F(i.j) is the diagonal matrix elements and q i is donor orbital occupancy.…”
Section: Natural Bond Orbital (Nbo) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%