2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Technique for Pipe Roughness Calibration and Sensor Placement for Water Distribution Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C factor can be considered as a static parameter [54] unless maintenance activities are employed to restore it. Estimating the C factor usually requires a large amount of data [54], [55], and an empirical equation based on only a few parameters is often useful for estimating the C factor [38], [51], [56]. In terms of practical applications, this simplification plays a major role in engineering judgment.…”
Section: A Hydraulic Geodesic Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C factor can be considered as a static parameter [54] unless maintenance activities are employed to restore it. Estimating the C factor usually requires a large amount of data [54], [55], and an empirical equation based on only a few parameters is often useful for estimating the C factor [38], [51], [56]. In terms of practical applications, this simplification plays a major role in engineering judgment.…”
Section: A Hydraulic Geodesic Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, node pressures are more sensitive to leaks than flow rates, which is why many localization algorithms are based primarily on pressure measurements. The problem of sensor placement is closely related to other WDN management problems, such as the state estimation of the network [4][5][6], model calibration [7,8], water quality monitoring such as detection of contaminants and cyberattacks [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], among others. Nevertheless, the present work focuses on the context of leak detection and localization as discussed in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques have been proposed to estimate the nodal water demand. Examples include evolutionary algorithm(EA) based methods (Dini and Tabesh 2014;Di Nardo et al 2015), explicit methods (Du et al 2015), singular value decomposition (SVD) methods (Weber and Hos 2020), and data assimilation methods (Bragalli et al 2016;Chu et al 2021a;Kang and Lansey 2009;Qin and Boccelli 2019;Rajakumar et al 2019;Zhou et al 2018). For the EA-based methods, the nodal water demand is estimated by minimizing the deviation from the model-simulated values to the measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%