1996
DOI: 10.2307/2171846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
2,246
0
102

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,897 publications
(2,493 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
29
2,246
0
102
Order By: Relevance
“…Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock proposed an efficient test after modifying the Dickey-Fuller test statistic using a generalized least squares (GLS) rationale (Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock, 1996). According to Elliot et al (1996), their test has superior power when there exists an unknown trend or mean in data.…”
Section: Dickey-fuller Gls Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock proposed an efficient test after modifying the Dickey-Fuller test statistic using a generalized least squares (GLS) rationale (Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock, 1996). According to Elliot et al (1996), their test has superior power when there exists an unknown trend or mean in data.…”
Section: Dickey-fuller Gls Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is a solution suggested by the literature for the power problem 2 (Taylor, 2002). According to Elliot et al (1996), "the Dickey-Fuller ttest applied to a locally demeaned or detrended time series, using a data-dependent lag length selection procedure, has the best overall performance in terms of small-sample size and power." Second, it allows for deterministic trends, in the spirit of the Balassa-Samuelson effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are number of unit root tests available, i.e. ADF test by Dickey and Fuller, (1981); PP test by Philips and Perron, (1988) and DF-GLS test by Elliott et al (1996) to check the stationary property of the variables, but these test assume no structural shock during the sample period. However, Banerjee et al (1992) argues that the unit root test hypothesis could be biased if there is endogenous structure shock in the macroeconomic variables.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%