2022
DOI: 10.1002/aisy.202100249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Training of the Memristive Deep Belief Net Immune to Non‐Idealities of the Synaptic Devices

Abstract: The tunability of conductance states of various emerging non-volatile memristive devices emulates the plasticity of biological synapses, making it promising in the hardware realization of large-scale neuromorphic systems. The inference of the neural network can be greatly accelerated by the vector-matrix multiplication (VMM) performed within a crossbar array of memristive devices in one step. Nevertheless, the implementation of the VMM needs complex peripheral circuits and the complexity further increases sinc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show a large A p of 5, and the number of effective conductance states in our organic synapses is 20 (Figure a). Device nonlinearity and limited conductance states are common problems among many neuromorphic synaptic devices, increasing the difficulty of device deployments and neural network training. ,, Note that the fabricated organic synapses only worked in the conductance potentiation regime as light pulses were continuously applied, leading to positive weight values. Hence, the simulated synaptic weight in the hardware-based devices is derived from the difference between the conductance values of two equivalent organic synapses ( w = G + – G – , where G + and G – are the conductance values of two equivalent devices), realizing the negative weight update (inset in Figure b, Figure S9, and Note S9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show a large A p of 5, and the number of effective conductance states in our organic synapses is 20 (Figure a). Device nonlinearity and limited conductance states are common problems among many neuromorphic synaptic devices, increasing the difficulty of device deployments and neural network training. ,, Note that the fabricated organic synapses only worked in the conductance potentiation regime as light pulses were continuously applied, leading to positive weight values. Hence, the simulated synaptic weight in the hardware-based devices is derived from the difference between the conductance values of two equivalent organic synapses ( w = G + – G – , where G + and G – are the conductance values of two equivalent devices), realizing the negative weight update (inset in Figure b, Figure S9, and Note S9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitation of Previous Utilizations of the Hardware Stochasticity: The BS that could be provided by the intrinsic noise or stochastic nature made them ready to be employed in Hopfield-type neural networks, such as finding the global minima in constraint satisfaction problems [23,[48][49][50] or learning through contrastive divergence in restricted Boltzmann machines. [51,52] However, for deep learning with the error backpropagation and gradient descent rule, the jigsaw puzzle of the in situ learning independent of the von-Neumann architecture within a neuromorphic system was not completed. For instance, a neural sampling machine with stochastic synapses of ferroelectric field effect transistors was recently reported for the learning and inference of a fully connected neural network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empirical model capturing the synaptic behavior of LTP and LTD under identical pulses was used to simulate the synaptic plasticity of the analog memristors with nonidealities. [ 52 ] This model considered the on/off ratio, the nonlinearities (αp$\left(\alpha\right)_{\text{p}}$ and αd$\left(\alpha\right)_{\text{d}}$), the asymmetry between potentiation and depression, and the write variations. The median conductance changes (without cycle‐to‐cycle write variations) for a memristor device with conductance Gij$G_{i j}$ under potentiation pulses and depression pulses can be written asΔGpot¯=[GmaxGmin1eαp(GijGmin)](1eαpfalse/Np)$$\overset{\cdot}{\Delta G_{\text{pot}}} = \left[\right.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated nonlinearity values (β P /β D ) are 1.8/1.3 for potentiation and depression, respectively. Supplementary Note 3 in the Supporting Information provides detailed weight update relationships with nonlinearity factors that have a significant impact on the neuromorphic computing performance. , As described in Figure d, each electrical stimulus induces the migration of iodine vacancies, which is displayed by the gradual change of the conductance of the device. When a negative voltage is applied to the top electrode, iodine vacancies with positive charge migrate and accumulate at the interface between the top electrode and the CsCu 2 I 3 thin film, forming a conductive filament.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%