2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols in the presence of ZrCl4 as a reusable catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One disadvantage of HMDS is its poor silylating power in the absence of a suitable catalyst, needing forceful conditions and long reaction times in many cases. [10] To solve this problem, a variety of catalysts, including (CH 3 ) 3 SiCl, [11] ZrCl 4 , [12] ZnCl 2 , [13] K-10 montmorillonite, [14] LiClO 4 , [15] H 3 PW 12 O 40 , [16] iodine, [17] InBr 3 , [18] zirconium sulfophenyl phosphonate, [19] CuSO 4 .5H 2 O, [20] sulfonic acid-functionalized nanoporous silica, [21] MgBr 2 ·OEt 2 , [22] LaCl 3 , [23] poly(N-bromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide) and N,N,N ,Ntetrabromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide, [24] Fe(TFA) 3 , [25] Fe 3 O 4 , [26] (n-Bu 4 N)Br, [27] trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA), [28] HClO 4 -SiO 2 , [29] Pd [30] and ZrO(OTf) 2 , [31] have been reported for trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols. Although these procedures provide an improvement, many of the catalysts or activators need long reaction times, drastic reaction conditions or tedious workups, or are moisture-sensitive or expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of HMDS is its poor silylating power in the absence of a suitable catalyst, needing forceful conditions and long reaction times in many cases. [10] To solve this problem, a variety of catalysts, including (CH 3 ) 3 SiCl, [11] ZrCl 4 , [12] ZnCl 2 , [13] K-10 montmorillonite, [14] LiClO 4 , [15] H 3 PW 12 O 40 , [16] iodine, [17] InBr 3 , [18] zirconium sulfophenyl phosphonate, [19] CuSO 4 .5H 2 O, [20] sulfonic acid-functionalized nanoporous silica, [21] MgBr 2 ·OEt 2 , [22] LaCl 3 , [23] poly(N-bromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide) and N,N,N ,Ntetrabromobenzene-1,3-disulfonamide, [24] Fe(TFA) 3 , [25] Fe 3 O 4 , [26] (n-Bu 4 N)Br, [27] trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA), [28] HClO 4 -SiO 2 , [29] Pd [30] and ZrO(OTf) 2 , [31] have been reported for trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols. Although these procedures provide an improvement, many of the catalysts or activators need long reaction times, drastic reaction conditions or tedious workups, or are moisture-sensitive or expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trimethylsilyl, tetrahydropyranyl and methoxymethyl ethers were prepared according to the literature procedures. 16,17,[25][26][27] All oxidation products are known compounds; they are identified by comparison of their physical data, IR and NMR spectra with those of authentic samples. Yields refer to isolated products or their 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentration of the organic layer under vacuum gave crude mass, which was purified by column chromatography with silica gel. 1 H and 13 C NMR data for known products are the same with literature values [8,14,[33][34][35][36]. Spectral data and HRMS values for new products are given below (entries 6, 7, 9, 11, 13-15, 18-22 and 26).…”
Section: Trimethylsilylation Of Alcohols and Phenolsmentioning
confidence: 98%