2015
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2015.1105372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient tuning of potential parameters for liquid–solid interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the use of a linear dependence (Equation (1)), they estimated the line tension and they defined several parameters of the interaction between water molecules and silicon atoms with the use of the experimental wetting angles of macrosize droplet as input. Later on, it was shown in [2] that the simulation of a cylindrical droplet is more efficient than this of spherical droplets for the evaluation of the interaction parameters between a droplet and a substrate, since the curvature of the three-phase contact line is equal to zero [3] in http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08844 the case of cylindrical droplets. Leroy et al [4] have shown recently that the evaluation of the forcefields parameterization using experimental wetting angles of droplet has limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of a linear dependence (Equation (1)), they estimated the line tension and they defined several parameters of the interaction between water molecules and silicon atoms with the use of the experimental wetting angles of macrosize droplet as input. Later on, it was shown in [2] that the simulation of a cylindrical droplet is more efficient than this of spherical droplets for the evaluation of the interaction parameters between a droplet and a substrate, since the curvature of the three-phase contact line is equal to zero [3] in http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08844 the case of cylindrical droplets. Leroy et al [4] have shown recently that the evaluation of the forcefields parameterization using experimental wetting angles of droplet has limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, according to a three component model of Yu and Choi [40], a nanofluid can be represented as a composition of nanoparticles, fluid and an interfacial layer surrounding the nanoparticles. This layer appears as a result of interfacial interaction between atoms of solid and fluid [41,42]. Being dependent on nanoparticle volume fraction, continuously increasing specific area of the interfacial layers is supposed to be responsible for the overall enhancing the thermal conductivity [18,22,43,44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in ref. [31] a small portion of the liquid region near the wall was excluded to remove any influence of the copper wall on the contact angle calculation. Once the profile was calculated, an algebraic circle fit was used to estimate the droplet boundary as well as its intersection with the horizontal substrate.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%