2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2009.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient voting prediction for pairwise multilabel classification

Abstract: The pairwise approach to multilabel classification reduces the problem to learning and aggregating preference predictions among the possible labels. A key problem is the need to query a quadratic number of preferences for making a prediction. To solve this problem, we extend the recently proposed QWeighted algorithm for efficient pairwise multiclass voting to the multilabel setting, and evaluate the adapted algorithm on several real-world datasets. We achieve an average-case reduction of classifier evaluations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we are also working on expanding these results to other learning problems where binary decomposition techniques are applied. To that end, we have obtained very positive results for the calibrated ranking approach to multilabel classification (Mencía et al 2010), and have promising preliminary results for ranking problems (Park and Fürnkranz 2007b). a subset of non-incident classifiers of c i .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, we are also working on expanding these results to other learning problems where binary decomposition techniques are applied. To that end, we have obtained very positive results for the calibrated ranking approach to multilabel classification (Mencía et al 2010), and have promising preliminary results for ranking problems (Park and Fürnkranz 2007b). a subset of non-incident classifiers of c i .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The performance of TSCCA and TSPCCA are compared with the CLR method with majority voting strategy for pairwise multi-label classification [10], QWeightedML algorithm [8], Multi-label k-NN (ML-kNN) [3], Classifier Chain method (CC) [7] and the Two Stage Voting Method (TSVM) [9]. The training and the testing of TSCCA and TSPCCA were performed using a custom developed application that uses the MULAN 1 library for the machine learning framework Weka [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At prediction time (when majority voting strategy is usually used), one will get a ranking over Q + 1 labels (the Q original labels plus the calibration label). Besides the majority voting that is usually used strategy in the prediction phase of the CLR algorithm, Mencia et al [8] propose another more effective voting algorithm named Quick Weighted Voting algorithm for multi-label classification(QWeightedML). In our previous work [9] we proposed two stage voting strategy that signifcantly improves the testing times of the CLR and QWeightedML methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods usually belong to the group of algorithm adaptation methods. Other proposed methods, based on problem transformation, use base classifiers with higher computational efficiency, such as Naive Bayes [7] [15], the one-layer perceptron [9], etc., in order to reduce the computational complexity.…”
Section: The Landscape Of Mlc Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%