2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effort shapes social cognition and behaviour: A neuro-cognitive framework

Abstract: Theoretical accounts typically posit that variability in social behaviour is a function of capacity limits. We argue that many social behaviours are goal-directed and effortful, and thus variability is not just a function of capacity, but also motivation. Leveraging recent work examining the cognitive, computational and neural basis of effort processing, we put forward a framework for motivated social cognition. We argue that social cognition is demanding, people avoid its effort costs, and a core-circuit of b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(330 reference statements)
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor shaping social learning is motivation, which may also explain the differences in performance observed here. Although empathy is an effortful process that people sometimes tend to avoid (63,64), it may still be affected by stronger motivational factors, e.g., approach motives (65), than the demand to find a monetary reward. Perhaps the evaluative feedback, e.g., the emotional response in the form of a smiling or sad face, is considered more valuable than a reward in the form of money in a closet (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor shaping social learning is motivation, which may also explain the differences in performance observed here. Although empathy is an effortful process that people sometimes tend to avoid (63,64), it may still be affected by stronger motivational factors, e.g., approach motives (65), than the demand to find a monetary reward. Perhaps the evaluative feedback, e.g., the emotional response in the form of a smiling or sad face, is considered more valuable than a reward in the form of money in a closet (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential challenge for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is navigating the complexity of social interactions; such complexity may increase the perceived effort required for a successful interaction [ 39 , 40 ]. Thus, increased positive social appraisals could have also led to reductions in perceived effort required to communicate effectively or simply could have enhanced the extent to which these interactions were perceived as enjoyable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other social animals, humans can ‘sense’ the mental states of others [ 92 ], that is, we can reasonably predict the emotional statuses (empathy), intentions, and perspectives (Theory of Mind) of others, and based on our perceptions, we perform prosocial activities that reward these others. Furthermore, these prosocial activities are critical for eliciting healthy social interactions.…”
Section: Default Mode Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these prosocial activities are critical for eliciting healthy social interactions. Empathy can be defined as the ability to understand and share the affective states of others, and the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACCg) and subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus (sgACC) are usually involved in the process of empathy [ 92 , 93 ]. The Theory of Mind concerns ability to assess the mental states of others [ 94 - 96 ], and several kinds of tests such as the Sally-Ann test, the dot perspective task, and the ambiguous figure perception test support this theory [ 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Default Mode Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation