Efforts to end a stalemate in landslide insurance availability through inclusive policymaking: A case study in Sitka, Alaska

Izenberg, Max; Clark‐Ginsberg, Aaron; Clancy, Noreen; Busch, Lisa; Schmidt, Jacyn; Dixon, Lloyd

doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103202

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We conducted a nine-month effort from April 2021 to November 2021 consisting of twenty-four key informant interviews, a facilitated half-day workshop in Sitka on October. 4 described in Appendix A, and a post-workshop survey for participants [45,46]. The insurance workshop included a facilitated discussion regarding exposure maps, which led to the decision to include on the dashboard a map with sufficient resolution so that users could judge risk in their immediate neighborhood, but without sufficient resolution to identify specific properties.…”

Section: Research Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results suggested that almost all the participants found that the workshop improved their understanding of the challenges of securing landslide insurance, intended to share what they learned with others, and wanted to see landslide insurance become more available. However, less than a third of participants reported that the workshop increased their optimism that such insurance would become available [45,46].…”

Section: Did the Co-design Process Succeed?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Community-Level, Participatory Co-Design for Landslide Warning with Implications for Climate Services

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inclusive, participatory governance is a key enabler of effective responses to natural hazard risks exacerbated by climate change. This paper describes a community-level co-design process among academic, state, and federal scientists and the community of Sitka, Alaska to develop a novel landslide warning system for this small coastal town. The decentralized system features an online dashboard which displays current and forecast risk levels to help residents make their own risk management decisions. The system and associated risk communications are informed by new geoscience, social, and information science generated during the course of the project. This case study focuses on our project team’s activities and addresses questions including: what activities did the project team conduct, what did these activities intend to accomplish, and did these activities accomplish what they intended? The paper describes the co-design process, the associated changes in system design and research activities, and formal and informal evaluations of the system and process. Overall, the co-design process appears to have generated a warning system the Sitka community finds valuable, helped to align system design with local knowledge and community values, significantly modified the scientists’ research agendas, and helped navigate sensitivities such as the effect of landslide exposure maps on property values. Other communities in SE Alaska are now adopting this engagement approach. The paper concludes with broader implications for the role of community-level, participatory co-design and risk governance for climate services.

show abstract

Section: Research Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Did the Co-design Process Succeed?mentioning

confidence: 99%