2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4280-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFTfitter: a tool for interpreting measurements in the context of effective field theories

Abstract: Over the past years, the interpretation of measurements in the context of effective field theories has attracted much attention in the field of particle physics. We present a tool for interpreting sets of measurements in such models using a Bayesian ansatz by calculating the posterior probabilities of the corresponding free parameters numerically. An example is given, in which top-quark measurements are used to constrain anomalous couplings at the W tb-vertex.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 to constrain the Wilson coefficientsC uB ,C uG andC uW . We use a new implementation of the EFTfitter tool [75] based on the Bayesian Analysis Toolkit -BAT.jl [76,77]. This allows to perform fits of Wilson coefficients in a Bayesian reasoning, yielding (marginalized) posterior probability distributions of the parameters.…”
Section: Constraining Wilson Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 to constrain the Wilson coefficientsC uB ,C uG andC uW . We use a new implementation of the EFTfitter tool [75] based on the Bayesian Analysis Toolkit -BAT.jl [76,77]. This allows to perform fits of Wilson coefficients in a Bayesian reasoning, yielding (marginalized) posterior probability distributions of the parameters.…”
Section: Constraining Wilson Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the wealth of precision measurements presented by the LHC collaborations in recent years, together with the significant progress in the corresponding theoretical calculations and modelling of collider processes, has motivated many groups to pursue (partial) SMEFT analyses of the LHC data [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] complemented often with input from lower-energy experiments such as the LEP electroweak precision tests. In these fits, constraints on the SMEFT operators can be provided not only by "traditional" processes such as electroweak gauge boson and Higgs production, but also by other high-p T processes such as jet and top quark production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end we note that while the imaginary parts of anomalous tensorial couplings are most severely constrained by EDM's of neutron and electron, BR(b → sγ) constrains |g L | and W -helicity fraction from the collider data constrain the |g R | most effectively. Recentl global fits to the LHC and Tevatron data [87][88][89][90][91] and the limits on g R are not very strong.…”
Section: Constraint Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%