2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egalitarianism under population change: Age structure does matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, for a given amount of initial aggregate capital, welfare will be 17 Wildasin (1986) proposes to switch to Rawlsian planners to get rid of "unequal treatment of equals" (see also Fujita and Thisse, 2002, Chapter 3). However, as shown by Boucekkine et al (2014) in a non-spatial dynamic model, the Benthamite planner can be egalitarian if she is allowed to choose population size.…”
Section: Main Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, for a given amount of initial aggregate capital, welfare will be 17 Wildasin (1986) proposes to switch to Rawlsian planners to get rid of "unequal treatment of equals" (see also Fujita and Thisse, 2002, Chapter 3). However, as shown by Boucekkine et al (2014) in a non-spatial dynamic model, the Benthamite planner can be egalitarian if she is allowed to choose population size.…”
Section: Main Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 This feature is shared with the Alonso-Mills-Muth model. 8Boucekkine et al (2014) prove in a non spatial setting that when age structure matters, typically when lifetime is finite, and when the social planner chooses the optimal population size, the Benthamite social welfare function does ensure egalitarianism in consumption per capita across generations!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another analytical tool, also used in this issue (see Boucekkine et al [28]), is the dynamic programming approach as advocated by Barucci and Gozzi [17] and Fabbri and Gozzi [44] in different infinite-dimensional optimal control problems (with state equations governed by first-order PDEs and delay differential equations, respectively). See also a more recent application to the optimal population size problem by Boucekkine et al [27]. In all these cases, one has first to rewrite the original infinite-dimensional problem as an optimal control problem driven by an ODE in a suitable functional (Hilbert) space, following Bensoussan et al [24].…”
Section: Hamilton-jacobi-bellman Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economic growth models with endogenous population growth, each generation faces a tradeoff between higher consumption levels and population growth because child-rearing is costly. For example, in the model of Boucekkine et al (2011Boucekkine et al ( , 2014, the output of the consumption good is partly devoted to raising children. Thus, in such a model, if both u ∈ N −− and v ∈ N ++ are feasible, then, by (16), the total resources used to yield the heads of v are larger than those for u, and thus, we may find another feasible stream w of utility vectors such that w P * O u (or w P * C u).…”
Section: Avoidance Of the Weak Repugnant Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For intergenerational problems where demographic changes across generations matter, such as for the design of a population policy to reverse a declining birthrate, the population size of each generation needs to be considered. The relationship between population growth and economic growth is one of the issues studied in economic growth theory, and an optimal population size is analyzed through economic growth models with endogenous population growth (e.g., Boucekkine and Fabbri 2013;Boucekkine et al 2011Boucekkine et al , 2014Palivos and Yip 1993;Razin and Yuen 1995). These models define an optimality criterion for infinite streams of finite-and variabledimensional utility vectors and are, therefore, not amenable to evaluation relations for infinite utility streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%