2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges

Abstract: Orthologous relationships form the basis of most comparative genomic and metagenomic studies and are essential for proper phylogenetic and functional analyses. The third version of the eggNOG database (http://eggnog.embl.de) contains non-supervised orthologous groups constructed from 1133 organisms, doubling the number of genes with orthology assignment compared to eggNOG v2. The new release is the result of a number of improvements and expansions: (i) the underlying homology searches are now based on the SIMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
397
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(410 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
397
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ORFs that did not map to those data sets were then self-clustered using cd-hit (using the same parameters as above), resulting in a total of 27 685 POV PCs containing X20 ORFs each. These PCs were then annotated using the Similarity Matrix of Proteins (Rattei et al, 2006) to assign taxonomy (NCBI) and function (TIGRFAM), with additional functional information obtained from eggNOG (Powell et al, 2012;4 March 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORFs that did not map to those data sets were then self-clustered using cd-hit (using the same parameters as above), resulting in a total of 27 685 POV PCs containing X20 ORFs each. These PCs were then annotated using the Similarity Matrix of Proteins (Rattei et al, 2006) to assign taxonomy (NCBI) and function (TIGRFAM), with additional functional information obtained from eggNOG (Powell et al, 2012;4 March 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the group with the highest totaled bit score, the best hit was chosen to annotate the query sequence. To infer Clusters of Orthologous Group (COG), each protein was assigned to the best match in eggNOG (v3.0) database (Powell et al, 2012) using BLASTp with an e-value cutoff of 10 À 5 . Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats were identified in contigs using PILER-CR (v1.06, http://www.drive5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation, we constructed a test set of homology data from the Homologene (release 67, [10]), PIRSF (release 2012 03, [15]), and eggNOG (release 3.0, [12]) biological databases. The groupings from each of these databases were loaded into a single database for the construction of trust views and querying.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such databases are often made accessible to the scientific community. In our research, we aim to combine the insight into orthologous groupings contained in Homologene [10], PIRSF [15], and eggNOG [12]. An automatic combination of these sources may provide a continuously evolving representation of the current combined scientific insight into orthologous groupings of higher quality than any single heuristic could provide for other bioinformaticians to utilize.…”
Section: Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%