2019 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/3ict.2019.8910293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eGovemment service quality measurement scales: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality dimension of user satisfaction is required to construct a broad evaluation scale that can measure the smart devices’ nature with consideration of unique features such as portability, personalisation, limitation of technical features, input features, location, and interaction features ( Demir et al, 2020 ; Khan, Zubair & Malik, 2019 ). The reliability is one of the mGovernment quality factor that has the ability to measure the system performance using the attributes of “timeliness, accuracy, error-free, service promise, and confidentiality” ( Desmal et al, 2019a , 2019b , 2019c ). Using other online measurement scales such as e-Government, e-Commerce, and eRetailing in mGovernment services can lead to difficulties in understanding user satisfaction because each of the contexts has its features and requires a particular measurement scale ( Song & Christen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality dimension of user satisfaction is required to construct a broad evaluation scale that can measure the smart devices’ nature with consideration of unique features such as portability, personalisation, limitation of technical features, input features, location, and interaction features ( Demir et al, 2020 ; Khan, Zubair & Malik, 2019 ). The reliability is one of the mGovernment quality factor that has the ability to measure the system performance using the attributes of “timeliness, accuracy, error-free, service promise, and confidentiality” ( Desmal et al, 2019a , 2019b , 2019c ). Using other online measurement scales such as e-Government, e-Commerce, and eRetailing in mGovernment services can lead to difficulties in understanding user satisfaction because each of the contexts has its features and requires a particular measurement scale ( Song & Christen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability evaluates service access and uptime [16,22]. Mobile devices are reliant on networks, servers, and integrations.…”
Section: Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second topic regarding the role of government was found in 19 policies or 73.08% of the total policies regarding digital transformation found. Presidential Regulation 95/2018 regulates the governance and management of the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) in Indonesia, with the establishment of a master plan coordinated by the Digital transformation in the public perspective also concerns the term e-government, which is carried out to improve service quality, increase accessibility to services and information, and increase the effectiveness of transactions that benefit public organizations and service users [54]. In e-government, mapping using Nvivo 12 Pro is divided into five subtopics: data integration, digitalization in public services, e-government system, monitoring and evaluation, risk management, and technology infrastructure.…”
Section: Digital Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%