eHealth Applications to Support Independent Living of Older Persons: Scoping Review of Costs and Benefits Identified in Economic Evaluations

Abstract

Background eHealth applications are constantly increasing and are frequently considered to constitute a promising strategy for cost containment in health care, particularly if the applications aim to support older persons. Older persons are, however, not the only major eHealth stakeholder. eHealth suppliers, caregivers, funding bodies, and health authorities are also likely to attribute value to eHealth applications, but they can differ in their value attribution because they are affected differently by eHealth costs and benefits. Therefore, any assessment of the value of eHealth applications requires the consideration of multiple stakeholders in a holistic and integrated manner. Such a holistic and reliable value assessment requires a profound understanding of the application’s costs and benefits. The first step in measuring costs and benefits is identifying the relevant costs and benefit categories that the eHealth application affects. Objective The aim of this study is to support the conceptual phase of an economic evaluation by providing an overview of the relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits incorporated in economic evaluations so far. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search covering papers published until December 2019 by using the Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, and CINAHL EBSCOhost databases. We included papers on eHealth applications with web-based contact possibilities between clients and health care providers (mobile health apps) and applications for self-management, telehomecare, telemedicine, telemonitoring, telerehabilitation, and active healthy aging technologies for older persons. We included studies that focused on any type of economic evaluation, including costs and benefit measures. Results We identified 55 papers with economic evaluations. These studies considered a range of different types of costs and benefits. Costs pertained to implementation activities and operational activities related to eHealth applications. Benefits (or consequences) could be categorized according to stakeholder groups, that is, older persons, caregivers, and health care providers. These benefits can further be divided into stakeholder-specific outcomes and resource usage. Some cost and benefit types have received more attention than others. For instance, patient outcomes have been predominantly captured via quality-of-life considerations and various types of physical health status indicators. From the perspective of resource usage, a strong emphasis has been placed on home care visits and hospital usage. Conclusions Economic evaluations of eHealth applications are gaining momentum, and studies have shown considerable variation regarding the costs and benefits that they include. We contribute to the body of literature by providing a detailed and up-to-date framework of cost and benefit categories that any interested stakeholder can use as a starting point to conduct an economic evaluation in the context of independent living of older persons.

Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions

“…In response to the pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and private insurers expanded coverage for both video and phone telehealth visits, and telemedicine utilization increased exponentially [3][4][5] and expanded into primary care [6,7]. While further study is needed to explore the challenges of telemedicine [8], initial studies have found that with certain patient populations and conditions, telemedicine is associated with a number of patient and clinician benefits, including reduced appointment wait times, costs, improved medication adherence and blood pressure control, and high rates of patient and clinician satisfaction [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”

Relationship Between Perceived Risks of Using mHealth Applications and the Intention to Use Them Among Older Adults in the Netherlands: Cross-sectional Study

“…The global increase in the proportion of older adults is therefore expected to significantly increase global health care usage and costs [6]. To keep the health care system sustainable in the future, governments and societies are considering technology as a promising solution for health service delivery innovation and for service expansion without increasing human resource capacity [7][8][9]. Moreover, the COVID-19 outbreak has had extensive consequences for the provision of health care.…”

Enablers and barriers in upscaling telemonitoring across geographic boundaries: a scoping review

“…Reimbursement is mentioned as a solution—‘a suitable reimbursement solution should be adopted24’—or as a barrier: ‘there is no financial backing to adopt new systems such as remote monitoring’ 40. Economic evaluations of eHealth applications are gaining momentum, and studies have shown considerable variation regarding the costs and benefits that they include 42. Economic studies on telemonitoring in heart failure and women at risk of pre-eclampsia describe this duality.…”